Originally Posted by
Grumble
A vast majority of the civilian casualties were victims of insurgent activity. Look at the comparisons between post war Iraq and post war Germany. Germany had a Nazi insurgency that refused to give up and pulled a lot of the same tactics in an effort to regain control by trying to turn the population against the Allies. It wasn't until they were fed up and squashed the insurgency themselves did they regain any stability. Iraq is ethinically much more diverse but there are a lot of parallels. The oil argument is continually driven by those that don't have anything else to argue. Tell me, if that were the case then why have oil and gas prices continued to rise in the west? They're triple (depending on how you add it up) now what they were in 2003. If we were looking to secure our own source, we'd be paying much less. The reality is we've (the coalition) helped them rebuild and secure the infastructure in order to help the gov't there become self sufficient and get back in the market. The fact is most Iraqi oil exports go to Asia (China, India and South Korea). The major source of oil in the US is domestic production, Saudi Arabia, Africa, Canada and South America, not in that order. Of the imports, Canada is the biggest supplier to the US.
Crude Oil and Total Petroleum Imports Top 15 Countries
Thanks for the link and you have some points but I find it a little ignorant to think that the Iraq War is all about helping the Iraqi people. I really believe that Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the security of oil supplies in the Middle East, hence another reason why we went over there. Let us not forget the downing street memo which basically kicked Tony Blair out of office in the UK and of course the lack of WMDs.