Originally Posted by
Gunter
FDXLAG,
You always think I'm talking about you when I make observations and give warnings. Not so. Sorry you took offense. We all have agendas. I don't think mine is hidden but that is for you to decide. No one should read a post here without considering what the writer is trying to accomplish. That is difficult at best without voice inflection and body language which is why the union encourages personal forms of comm with members.
The NC is getting a boat load of e-mails and phone calls. They're being asked to share their views and that's what they're trying to do. Some of our pilots refuse to put any effort in contacting anyone in the union and only check e-mail for the "news". If they were unavailable for comment many would be very unhappy.
If you (any individual) feel that is a hard sell because you aren't asking all those questions all I can say is you aren't the only one they're addressing. It's kinda like a speaker addressing a crowd. It's much easier being part of the crowd than the one trying to answer to it.
Gunter,
I did not feel you were addressing me, I did find your earlier post about motives and agendas amusing. We all have motives and agendas. Here is my E Mail I keep sending to the following address that keeps getting rejected. They really are the only questions I have, maybe you can relay them:
Gentlemen,
1. What section of the TA would be used to assign STVs after this TA is passed? How would the minor details like deconflicting training and an STV be handled for example?
2. How much would RLG in the 727 and the Bus have changed if the TA's 4A2b language would have been in force? Please pick any random 3 months to use as a comparison.
Thank You
This is the mail address that keeps getting rejected do you have a better one:
[email protected]