Thread: TA poll (FedEx)
View Single Post
Old 02-26-2011 | 11:08 AM
  #53  
FDXLAG
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by 4A2B
In short I am saying , FDA's are not leverage, anymore. The first round, they had a leverage like quality and I voted NO on that one too.

I am not claiming the world will fall apart with a no vote, actually saying quite the opposite. Life will go on, in this case with less money than we would have if the TA passes.

As far as the deal on the table, it makes sense to me. We are not going to get hurt by taking this deal. That is my opinion, and those of you that think the FDA is not worthy of the gains in this TA, then I am sure you will vote accordingly.

Unfortunately the only way we will know who was "correct" is if it fails, that is what I find funny about those claiming the lone dissenting vote in the FDA v1.0, was "right". Well he was right that it was a sub par piece of... It passed and, and with the exception of some F/O slots has been successful. We will never know how much more we could of got, because it passed. Now it is time to stop looking in the rear-view mirror on the FDA and improve it for those wanting to go in the future.

That is all, I don't like 4a2b or FDA's, but voting this down will not help our cause. That is the way I see it.
How about if it passes and FDX does not come to the table for 4 years. Wont that tell you something about what FDX wanted in this deal?

No had LOA 1.0 not passed (and remember it passed with a lot of changes) The company could not have opened HKG and their choice would have been to man it with SIBA, bargain some more, Or not open HKG. It was leverage then and it is leverage now,
Reply