Quote:
You argue to vote "Yes" on this TA --- but then admit we should have hard scope language "the sooner the better".
I think you misunderstood what I'm saying. I agree we should have a tighter scope clause for our international flying. We don't however, and if you accept the TA then we get our international FDA in Europe and possibly a larger base in Hong Kong. Scope isn't hurt. Fight the battle next time after the company is fully invested in our international pilot domiciles.Originally Posted by DLax85
Is that a trick answer??You argue to vote "Yes" on this TA --- but then admit we should have hard scope language "the sooner the better".
If we don't accept the TA we have a credible threat to our international flying that we can't fight because of our lack of scope.
Same idea, just looking at it thru different glasses.