Quote:
If we don't accept the TA we have a credible threat to our international flying that we can't fight because of our lack of scope.
Same idea, just looking at it thru different glasses.
I think the clinking noise I hear is the "scope can" being kicked down the street hard.Originally Posted by FDX1
I think you misunderstood what I'm saying. I agree we should have a tighter scope clause for our international flying. We don't however, and if you accept the TA then we get our international FDA in Europe and possibly a larger base in Hong Kong. Scope isn't hurt. Fight the battle next time after the company is fully invested in our international pilot domiciles.If we don't accept the TA we have a credible threat to our international flying that we can't fight because of our lack of scope.
Same idea, just looking at it thru different glasses.
Ok, I guess you are comfortable with supporting the "we are memorializing the flying" approach, all while agreeing that the flying isn't ours until we get a scope clause....???
Just wondering, isn't the HKG flying already memorialized after 3 years of FEDEX ALPA pilots flying it?
...and are you retiring within the next 5 years?
I'm just trying to understand the logic and the timeline.