Originally Posted by
Pragmatic1
If unity is truly our only leverage, then why threaten it by bringing us a partial agreement requiring us to speculate over the future implications. No where on any survey did I list a partial agreement as a desire in the next contract. I say give me a complete package to vote on a not this piece meal TA that actually brings up the leverage issue in the first place. If we were voting on a complete CBA lost of leverage would not be an issue. Yet another self imposed conflict.
I completely agree. I'll pay 3% to clean up 4A2b and all the other gray language. A contract agreement written poorly is as good as toilet paper and our past grievance record is a pretty good indication that our contract needs better "language" and less "intent".
If this TA passes and the company gets it FDA LOA plan on 2015 before any other changes happen
I am getting more optimistic though, more and more are starting to really think about the implications of this agreement.