View Single Post
Old 03-17-2011 | 06:51 AM
  #61946  
tsquare's Avatar
tsquare
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
No, not really. With longevity-based pay, you wouldn't see senior pilots packed in senior categories. They would be more evenly distributed.

Seems to me that if the company had to furlough, the F/O's would already be set to go. The junior Captains forced back down would distribute evenly across the former F/O spots. I'm not even sure they would need to be trained at all. I haven't spoken about the senior-most Captains yet, but these would not all be on one fleet, so the company could take a slow and measured approach to displacing them. And since they wouldn't populate any particular fleet, the loss of one entire fleet wouldn't even need to be weighed by the company against large displacements either.

You're actually trying to build the perfect flexible, scaleable, shrinkeable airline.
Not trying to build a scalable, shrinkable airline.. just trying to build in protections in the event that it does happen, and also to build in QOL without having to sacrifice money. IF the 747s get parked... how many guys will take a paycut? I'm tired of arguing this with closed minded people.