View Single Post
Old 03-29-2011 | 08:16 PM
  #57  
PCLCREW's Avatar
PCLCREW
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Assistant Greens Keeper
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Getting rid of ACA actually improved the UA operation. Reliability with the new carriers has been much better than when ACA was doing the flying. I am not buying that the passengers preferred a J-41 versus the RJ's now offered. I think the current mix is pretty good with the exception of ASA. Expressjet, Skywest, Republic and TSA seem to offer better service than in the past. Don't think I have ever been treated better than I have by the new UAX carriers when I have ridden on them, versus ACA and ARW. UA has fixed some of the issues at ORD, revamped the old ACA gates at IAD with good FIDS screens in the gates, at LAX we moved UAX to the 80 gates. It has been an evolving process.

I think letting ACA go was the best thing for UA the company. ACA was like the lazy guy that lives on unemployment and plays video games all day. It wasn't until the checks stopped coming that they realized they were in trouble. At any rate UA won the ACA war and has been financially and reliability better off without them. Too bad the employees of ACA bought into the big ideas of their management.
except the jumpseat war that was going on 3 years ago... where some of the UAX carriers were being told not to take mainline JSers??? Sounds like being treated pretty well IMO.
Speaking of LAX... What about the E120's? Should UAL get rid of skywest because they fly props?
So what your saying is UAL should pick the lowest bottoms feeders in the regional industry; saying they won the war with ACA because they cost more? I know many of the people you work with would totally disagree with that.
Reply