View Single Post
Old 04-03-2011 | 04:56 AM
  #63241  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by captainv
By blaming JC Lawson, you give him too much credit. It was company policy that new hires resign their seniority. Management chose not to change it and would never have considered it unless we opened up the contract and gave something up.

However, JC saw an opportunity and chose to exploit it, seeking more scope relief or a flow-through or whatever. When he was rebuffed, he chose to write the letter and twist the knife a bit more, when he could've simply written a letter of support, even though he was powerless to change it.

There's plenty to loathe about JC, especially his stance on this issue, but never forget it was management that ultimately decided not to help the DAL furloughs. Many of us line pilots vehemently disagreed.

I agree that the "issue" is bigger than JC Lawson. I also hope for the best for the Comair pilots. The sad reality is that the Comair pilots hitched their wagon to a company/MEC that wanted to extend its reach. While this is quite understandable for the company, it is the MEC that overstepped. The current Comair pilots are reaping the effects of that policy/strategy.

I have personally commuted on Comair with some regularity and never met a Comair pilot I didnt like, but that is not the issue.