Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Not incoherent, you just like to twist a meaning.
I NEVER twist meanings acl, that's why I always use the poster's EXACT words. This is what you said:
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
We realize that if we are to recapture or keep scope where it is at, the will has to come from this group with a "No" vote if or when it is offered to our pilots in a MEMRAT vote. If National signed a contract that we voted down, then you may have a point, but until that happens, the blame lies here.
My response was that your "if or when" statement was correct with regard to scope or any other section. It can be given away via an LOA completely outside of the Section 6 process, and completely without MEMRAT. You don't like to talk about that because it undermines many of your arguments.
I've not twisted your words, or your meanings.
Carl