Here's my conclusion:

If the status of single carrier for RAH doesn't in fact violate our PWA Section 1 language, then it goes to show just how weak our current Section 1 really is.

Either we have a good contract crafted by legal experts that is enforceable and means what it says, or our contract appears to cover many bases but when it comes right down to it the intent of the language isn't enforceable.

Cheers
George