Originally Posted by
Phuz
no greivance, so you guys are cool with subsidising the competition?
I still agree with the IBT:
- RAH's various entities are operating as a single transportation system as evidenced by substantial operational integration, common control and ownership, and overlapping senior management and labor relations at each subsidiary,
- That RAH holds out to the public that its operating carriers are part of a consolidated entity and thus held out as a single company of affiliates,
- That while each has a separate control entity and its own FAA certificate, their operations are all consolidated and commonly scheduled under the Frontier brand.
- That RAH's various carriers are presented on a consolidated basis for both financial and operating performance,
- That since acquiring Frontier that RAH has further consolidated administrative, operational, and labor functions of Frontier into RAH at its Indianapolis, Indiana headquarters,
- That Frontier employees are now under RAH’s handbooks and policies;
- That Frontier’s website links prospective employees to the RAH website to search for open positions; and finally,
- That there has been a combination of the branded operations by the various affiliates into the Frontier brand, which has resulted in RA and Chautauqua aircraft being painted in Frontier livery, and the flying of RA and Chautauqua planes as Frontier branded operations.
Also I agree with ALPA:
- RAH’s two types of operations make the finding of a single transportation system the only result consistent with the RLA’s representation structure.