Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp

For some reading in between the lines on the text about the RAH grievance in the MEC email... I don't think it's dead. We've known all along that the fact that RAH got declared an STS is not a violation of our section one, however it is the findings and the other intricacies that make it a violation... and a blatant one. On the surface though, it is not a violation and that email said a whole lot of nothing. Remember it's an email written by lawyers.

What can be pulled from this? There's more to come, and the entrenched types have got to be pushed (pushed out of the way if it becomes necessary) so they keep after it.



I'm looking forward to being able to bid the G550, personally.