Damn FTB, I just can't get enough! I even have my wife singing it! Yee haa! (insert Howard Dean's voice).[/QUOTE]
I linked the right second of that song. Because I was able to look at my wife and say, do you know what day it is? And hit play. She was mad. She's afraid she's going to get it stuck in her head.
Originally Posted by
tsquare
OK fine... I am not going into DEFCON 5 over this... yet.
DEFCON 5 depends on whether or not you believe this :
At the direction of the MEC, ALPA legal counsel will again review the various issues involved related to the legal definition of an “air carrier” and provide a report to the MEC at its regular meeting in May.
If you do believe it, no DEFCON. If you don't, DEFCON.
Originally Posted by
tsquare
As far as I can tell, the contract has not been violated...
We can't grieve til the NMB gives us something to grieve - STS.
Originally Posted by
tsquare
conspiracy theories notwithstanding... (no insult intended) I know that our scope provisions do not allow RAH or anybody else to fly anything bigger than the 76 seat airplanes. If RAH wants to try to go big time and make it on their own.. I wish them the best of luck, because without the funding from DAL, I am pretty sure that their days are numbered. But back on track. There is nothing that I am aware of that would prevent Comair from buying 747s. They cannot put our code on them and they would not receive any help in any form from mama Delta. Maybe I am mistaken.. but that's the way I read it. Either way, I still think this is not worth going into high warble over just yet. If you guys wanna gnash teeth over this, have at it, but I think you are premature. JMHO.
I understand the priority issue with this, but if you remember the NOT ONE MORE SEAT slogan of the scope "hawks" then you can always adopt this slogan- STOP FUNDING THE COMPETITION TODAY.
As to the contract and 747s to OH, I differ, but that won't stop me from posting this in your honor...
