View Single Post
Old 04-24-2011 | 06:02 PM
  #17  
luv757's Avatar
luv757
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 15
From: 18%er but I’ll enforce UPA23 to the last period.
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
That's what our merger committee chair tried to tell us at first. The problem is, there is absolutely no requirement for a JCAB or a JSLI to get a SOC. US Airways proved that. They were issued a SOC in 2007 and still do not have either a list or a contract. Who needs "synergies" when your pilot costs are this cheap?

Sled
I think, emphasis on think, that US got the SOC only because they were able to demonstrate that the pilots were bickering over seniority. Since our SLI won't kickoff until a JCBA, it could be argued that the company has to demonstrate that they have been negotiating in good faith to get an SOC prior to JCBA/SLI. So, again I think, the US situation really doesn't apply. An SOC is not a forgone conclusion without some movement towards a JCBA/SLI.

That said, I might be wrong so anyone that has a better answer feel free to correct this.
Reply