View Single Post
Old 04-28-2011 | 07:20 PM
  #64757  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Bucking Bar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Take away points from the RJET announcement:
  • As I've previously explained, Delta's capital expenditure constraints are going to push the company to outsource more flying. Much as a Fraternity with no budget for a party throws a BYOB event, Delta wants capacity BYOJet. Even in the case of the NWA merger, Delta wanted airplanes it did not have to pay for.
  • RJET's branded flying is not going well. Frontier's E Jet deliveries are being delayed, yet it still siphoned off airplanes for this new flying.
  • ALPA's course of conduct has been absolutely clear:
- This was defined as non Delta flying in previous versions of DAL scope
- NWA's MEC also defined that the E170/175 was to be operated property via their contract negotiations
- The Delta MEC divested Compass, reiterating this was not "Delta" flying
- The Delta MEC Chairman conceded additional aircraft while making road show presentations which touted the benefits of outsourcing

Anyone who thinks ALPA is going to pursue a grievance, or even object, just has not been paying attention.

Yeah, I told you so. My prognostication that the narrow body RFP will be effected by Delta's CapEx constraints stands. Again, I reiterate our MEC needs scope that focuses on PILOTS not airplanes. We need to define Delta flying inclusively and broadly. We need "Delta" pilots regardless of who's leases the airplanes.