Originally Posted by
iceman49
You have to ask if we do put a 320 base in ATL, what are we pulling out? There is only so much we can put in a capacity constrained airport and expect to have any kind of sked integrity. That would be great to hire more, maybe for the rest rules.
Ice,
I'd have to agree with B-Bar on this one. I've seen 73's doing the North routes, similar in comparison to what the 319/320 used to do. (Don't know, could just be seasonal work shift.) Even Bismarck, N.D., of all places, now has a 73 operating once a day instead of an Airbus. Most of the winter is covered with only RJ's.
I'm not advocating an ATL 320 base, not in my job description to figure those puzzles out, but sure would like to see another 600 new faces on property.
Flight attendants too!!
GJ
Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
RJ's for starters. Possibly some 737's to Detroit.