View Single Post
Old 05-19-2011 | 04:59 PM
  #66086  
n9810f
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Without the numbers in front of me, I can not be sure, but it seems the 747-400 is around 30% more expensive per RSM than the 777-200. The 777-300 is the answer for what Delta needs, but those require Cap Ex.

Back when we ran the merger numbers it was obvious which airplanes would go away in which order. The surprise has been that the strength of our network supported them as long as they did.

While NRT is not being talked about much, I'm sure that mess tanked the justification for keeping the 747's on the short term.

It would take digging into the cargo numbers to figure out if the 747 is a keeper. (It would seem Japan needs a Berlin Airlift, but that has not materialized)

In really crazy coincidences which mean nothing, Virgin has a dozen 747-400's. Now that BA/AA is tied up and Virgin's got the "Office of Fair Trading" up their butt, they need friends sooner rather than later.
I recall Richard or Ed saying something to the regards of having renegotiated the leased 747-400's shortly after the merger - that the rates were really attractive and it led to the decision to keep the 744's in the fleet going forward with cabin enhancements.