Originally Posted by
dragon
Am I misreading it? "Frontier is going to use the planes to operate other service as part of a partnership with DAL"?
Do we have a DCI agreement with Frontier? If not, perhaps this is enough for even the densest ALPA Lawyer to finally grow a set a declare RAH as one airline and in violation of Section 1.
Now, if I have misread the whole thing I'll go back to my corner and color. Of course, it could be the reporter has made a mistake in the article.
The way I read the NMB finding (on STS for RAH when it comes to representation) I see the NMB anazed that RAH is so confident they will not get called out on as being a STS that they have become either sloppy or indifferent in playing the ALPA approved multi-certificate shell game. They're no longer trying to hide the obvious.