Originally Posted by
jayray2
The irony in all of this mess is the guy responsible with coming up with a "fair and equitable" solution has lied to us three times. How is he still a credible arbitrator? Preceding your own self imposed deadlines with an "at the earliest" or the even more fashionable "in a best case scenario" would have made all the difference. You would think a lawyer would be familiar with these simple techniques.
This is standard for arbitration decisions. He was first give a very tight 30 day window which is unheard of for these types of things and then he had some extra items dropped in his lap at the 11th hour AFTER he had his decision prepared. Not making excuses for the guy but this is how it goes with this type of thing.
I do not know why everyone waits on bated breath for the decision, you all are just driving yourselves mad. Relax and get back to what matters in life and let the process run its course. Ironic also because the decision will most likely upset more than its fair share, why want the headaches in our lives?