View Single Post
Old 05-25-2011 | 06:03 AM
  #25  
Theoden
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: CRJ CA
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I didn't ask my union to form a MOU to hire XJ furlough pilots, who could retain their XJ longevity for Pinnacle pay. This is unheard of! When was the last time one airline did that for another? I didn't ask for about 90% of the stuff that gets put through (or put out) by our union.
(I'm an XJ pilot) The year leading up to July 1, some Mesaba pilots were working more cancelled 9E flights than actual XJ flights. 9E was cancelling a lot of flights for crews. They would even swap multiple flights over to the same broken plane so as to make it look like a maintainence cancellation. (Apparently this is less embarrasing than stranding pax because they simply wouldn't or couldn't staff their airline.) Well anyway these cancellations by 9E were a big problem for Delta. If 9E had not have employed XJ furloughees, and if the aquisition had not happened, what do you think would have happened? One possibility would be an asset transfer from the carrier that could not operate those assets to a carrier that could. The point is that it did not hurt 9E pilots to have XJ furloughees come in house to help staff the logistical disaster that was 9E. It would have been far worse to resolve cancellations by transferring flying away from 9E. One wonders: why didn't 9E simply hire enough people all those years? In any event, those XJ furloughees are not displacing senior 9E pilots and are not hurting 9E in general. In fact, their presense is a mutually beneficial event.
Reply