Originally Posted by
shimmydamp
Like Bartok said, it seems that the information DMEarc has is credible, like it or not. What does it matter to you who he is sourcing if it turns out the truth?
1. Why does he seem credible? Because he adds in a mysterious source at almighty "national".
2. Of couse his source matters, because without any accountability he could claim anything as truth.
You guys are in such a frenzy to attack that you forgot how to interact with your peers, let alone create a valid (or some semblenceof valid) argument.
This is why we are our own worst enemy, the list isn't even out and we already want to cut each others throats.
We all need to "Sit back, relax, and, enjoy the flight."
Welcome to Pinnacle (corp).