Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
1200hrs of High performance Military >

1200hrs of High performance Military

Search

Notices

1200hrs of High performance Military

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2018 | 09:49 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
I have absolutely ZERO doubt that a 135 guy or a KC-10 guy or a C-17 guy or a 130 guy or a COD guy or a B-52 guy or even a C-12 guy would be, at least initially, ten times better suited to this job than a single seat “high performance" guy. Absolutely NONE. No one cares about “high performance” time. The only reason it matters is because of the multiplier. And to their egos, apparently.....
Unless you have “been there done that”, I’d keep your opinion to yourself. Not everyone makes the cut for fighters/single seat and the rest go on to multicrew airframes by choice or not. Everything depends on the individual and airline flying/training is set with the lowest common denominator in mind.
Reply
Old 02-15-2018 | 11:00 PM
  #22  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
I have absolutely ZERO doubt that a 135 guy or a KC-10 guy or a C-17 guy or a 130 guy or a COD guy or a B-52 guy or even a C-12 guy would be, at least initially, ten times better suited to this job than a single seat “high performance" guy. Absolutely NONE. No one cares about “high performance” time. The only reason it matters is because of the multiplier. And to their egos, apparently.....
I will take you up on that....Least favorite pilots to fly with are C-17 pilots...Fighter guys are way better to spend a 4 day trip with. And the fighter guys catch on to the two or three things required to fly in a crew...
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 06:50 AM
  #23  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 16
From: Midfield downwind
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
I have absolutely ZERO doubt that a 135 guy or a KC-10 guy or a C-17 guy or a 130 guy or a COD guy or a B-52 guy or even a C-12 guy would be, at least initially, ten times better suited to this job than a single seat “high performance" guy. Absolutely NONE. No one cares about “high performance” time. The only reason it matters is because of the multiplier. And to their egos, apparently.....
Interesting opinion.

The people who hire pilots at airlines do not agree with you.
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 07:54 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit
I will take you up on that....Least favorite pilots to fly with are C-17 pilots...Fighter guys are way better to spend a 4 day trip with. And the fighter guys catch on to the two or three things required to fly in a crew...
That's a new one. Fighter guys are egotistical buttholes and heavy guys are laid back cool types-isn't that the perception? You just don't like the McChordites. The gravedigger gave them boyz a bad rap. Barney drivers are all right by me.
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 07:58 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Nucflash doesn't seem to realize that TACAIR guys have to adhere to all the safety regs as everyone else while undergoing physiological and psychological stresses (i.e. combat, carrier ops) that the others don't.

They may not have as much total flight time, but one could argue that their time is more decision making packed than droning in cruise across 10 time zones.

Besides, TACAIR guys are generally more fun to hang out with.
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 08:06 AM
  #26  
ArcticDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: On the aluminum Arctic snow sled
Default

Fighter pilots are better than heavy pilots, military pilots are better than civilian pilots, Airbus is better than Boeing, my #### is bigger than your ####. Blah blah blah. Who cares? A former CP once told me, anyone can take a nice guy/gal who is a mediocre pilot and make them a better pilot. It's impossible to take an ace pilot who is an ###hole and make him a better person! I've flown with great guys and gals who are former C-17, F-15, C-172 and I've flown with ones who are #####'s. It's about the person, not the propulsion. Rant over!
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 08:23 AM
  #27  
ForeverJunior's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by ArcticDog
Fighter pilots are better than heavy pilots, military pilots are better than civilian pilots, Airbus is better than Boeing, my #### is bigger than your ####. Blah blah blah. Who cares? A former CP once told me, anyone can take a nice guy/gal who is a mediocre pilot and make them a better pilot. It's impossible to take an ace pilot who is an ###hole and make him a better person! I've flown with great guys and gals who are former C-17, F-15, C-172 and I've flown with ones who are #####'s. It's about the person, not the propulsion. Rant over!
Hear! Hear!
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 11:20 PM
  #28  
NotTellin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: Upright & Breathing
Default

Originally Posted by ArcticDog
Fighter pilots are better than heavy pilots, military pilots are better than civilian pilots, Airbus is better than Boeing, my #### is bigger than your ####. Blah blah blah. Who cares? A former CP once told me, anyone can take a nice guy/gal who is a mediocre pilot and make them a better pilot. It's impossible to take an ace pilot who is an ###hole and make him a better person! I've flown with great guys and gals who are former C-17, F-15, C-172 and I've flown with ones who are #####'s. It's about the person, not the propulsion. Rant over!
Dilly Dilly!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
briddler10
Flight Schools and Training
7
07-13-2008 08:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices