![]() |
Originally Posted by Mea25000
(Post 2591314)
I would say the safe money is placed on a return to a single 737 fleet type over the next 6-10 years. All while not growing at all and watching the real airlines stomp us out |
Originally Posted by Mea25000
(Post 2591314)
A mixed fleet could continue indefinitely, or we may quickly return to a single fleet type, depending on many variables, all of which are being worked out right now. Rest assured though, if the economy begins to struggle at all, we will quickly move to zero growth and a single fleet type.
I would say the safe money is placed on a return to a single 737 fleet type over the next 6-10 years. 6-10 years? Alaska will be swallowed up before that. There’s no more hiding out in the little PNW. Either they’re gonna put their big boy britches on and play ball or they’re gonna end up playing behind the visitors dugout playing cup ball. |
Yeah right. More like playing dodge ball, because everyone will be taking shots at us. SW intra California and Hawaii, Delta in SEA, and United in SFO.
|
Originally Posted by Mea25000
(Post 2591227)
It’s posted:
JFK base closed August 31st.... How many times have I made stuff up? You all laughed and made fun of Me... AJ telling me to read the contract and that obviously I was an idiot. I am very sorry to those affected. I really was only trying to help and give you a heads up. I think that is why this board is so screwed up you tell the truth and all the children cuss you out. |
Email from a few hours ago
|
Effective September 1 before the final integration. Fold the Airbus pilots into the Airbus bases. Minimize cross training. Very easy to predict what this company is going to do regardless of their statements about “studying” this or that. Now do you believe us when we say that the no Airbus leases are going to be renewed.
|
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2591844)
Effective September 1 before the final integration. Fold the Airbus pilots into the Airbus bases. Minimize cross training. Very easy to predict what this company is going to do regardless of their statements about “studying” this or that. Now do you believe us when we say that the no Airbus leases are going to be renewed.
Even the old timers should be concerned. This is a ton of reorganizing, displacing, and probable reduction to deal with. |
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591885)
I don't know why everyone is so blase about the parking of the Airbusses. It's a huge reduction in mainline airframes that will have to be replaced. Not sure why everyone sucks at math, but Alaska doesn't have enough MAX orders on the books to make up the difference.
Even the old timers should be concerned. This is a ton of reorganizing, displacing, and probable reduction to deal with. |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2591894)
Uhm, you sir also need to read a little more thoroughly or not just repeat what you hear from others. Alaska has plenty of firm orders and options to replace all of the air buses and grow some on top. Maybe start with counting to 20, you can use your fingers and toes that way.
|
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2591894)
Uhm, you sir also need to read a little more thoroughly or not just repeat what you hear from others. Alaska has plenty of firm orders and options to replace all of the air buses and grow some on top. Maybe start with counting to 20, you can use your fingers and toes that way.
Here. Educate yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska...#Current_fleet 43 incoming orders. We have 63 A319/A320s. Hopefully you recognize that's about 20 short. I even used my fingers and toes. |
Nice try junior flyer, is that your final answer or are you ready to look stupid.
|
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2591920)
Nice try junior flyer, is that your final answer or are you ready to look stupid.
|
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591923)
All I hear is barking.
|
Ok here is a hint, how many options does Alaska have on top of firm orders? In the past 85 years how many of Alaska’s Boeing options did it not take. Good luck, and you guys wonder why you are so screwed up on this SLI.
|
You gonna need more then fingers and toes for this equation, buy a calculator
|
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2591933)
You gonna need more then fingers and toes for this equation, buy a calculator
No press releases. No sign of it on the order tally. Even on BOEING'S OWN WEBSITE, there is no sign of additional MAX options. https://i.imgur.com/oPr4Afb.png So do us all a favor, and show us where these "Double-secret 737 options" are? |
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591938)
Yeah, you're gonna have to source your BS on that one. I've been scouring the internet since the acquisition for news about orders and options, and there ain't nothing about OPTIONS.
No press releases. No sign of it on the order tally. Even on BOEING'S OWN WEBSITE, there is no sign of additional MAX options. https://i.imgur.com/oPr4Afb.png So do us all a favor, and show us where these "Double-secret 737 options" are? They have to be carved out of that PNW wood first. Then stained. It’s a long process. Not sure you need all your toes and fingers though. |
Lighten up I am only screwing around, music seemed to have a sense of humor on the last one. I am sure you are both great guys. 46 additional options right now
|
Our order 2016
57 firm (43 left to take) And 46 options 43 plus 46 =s. Wait for it 89 ding ding ding |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2591948)
43 plus 46 =s. Wait for it 89 ding ding ding
I'm sure it looks better from the top of the stack with 2500 guys and girls to cushion the fall, but nonetheless the master plan seems to be anything but. They just spent $2.5 billion on an airline to effectively dismantle it. That's insane from a business perspective. Talk about wasting resources. They say they wanted to compete in California, but all we're seeing is retreat. So you'll have to excuse my lack of humor on the matter. I've got life decisions to make. |
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591956)
Funny guy. I hope you realize we're all in the dark over here. They're making changes and from this vantage point - it looks f*cking grim.
I'm sure it looks better from the top of the stack with 2500 guys and girls to cushion the fall, but nonetheless the master plan seems to be anything but. They just spent $2.5 billion on an airline to effectively dismantle it. That's insane from a business perspective. Talk about wasting resources. They say they wanted to compete in California, but all we're seeing is retreat. So you'll have to excuse my lack of humor on the matter. I've got life decisions to make. |
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591914)
You've been consistently ignorant throughout your short life here on APC - keeping the streak alive I see.
Here. Educate yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska...#Current_fleet 43 incoming orders. We have 63 A319/A320s. Hopefully you recognize that's about 20 short. I even used my fingers and toes. |
Doood, the biggest set back for us is that when people boarded Virgin for the first time, they said "Wow". We were something to be proud of. Now, were just alaska.
|
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2592161)
You are missing the fact that 1 900=1.5 319’s and 1.x 320’s etc. It will not be a 1:1 replacement.
|
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2592165)
As far as I know, an A319 and a B739 have the same amount of pilot seats. It's a net loss as far as career progression.
|
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591956)
They just spent $2.5 billion on an airline to effectively dismantle it. That's insane from a business perspective.
|
Originally Posted by Ispeakjive
(Post 2592162)
Doood, the biggest set back for us is that when people boarded Virgin for the first time, they said "Wow". We were something to be proud of. Now, were just alaska.
|
Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
(Post 2592235)
Great. Those “Wow” people also didn’t pay your company enough to cover the costs. Everybody likes getting something for nothing but Alaska isn’t a Charity. I don’t care if our “guests” impressed or not. The vast majority just want to get where they’re going on time. Alaska Airlines is more than a sugar high and a cheeky ad campaign.
No dog in this, but I am a Cali guy... VX's financial trajectory was typical for a startup, especially given the timing (recession, oil spike). They clearly appeared to be on the right track to keep making money and more of it. Cali people loved the brand, their only complaint was that they didn't fly to more places. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2592275)
No dog in this, but I am a Cali guy...
VX's financial trajectory was typical for a startup, especially given the timing (recession, oil spike). They clearly appeared to be on the right track to keep making money and more of it. Cali people loved the brand, their only complaint was that they didn't fly to more places. |
Originally Posted by Ispeakjive
(Post 2592162)
Doood, the biggest set back for us is that when people boarded Virgin for the first time, they said "Wow". We were something to be proud of. Now, were just alaska.
I pegged you as a pretty smart person. A little negative but you always had a quick wit. What? you care about what? People getting off the plane, really, being proud? Ok, you will feel better if you care about the 5th and the 20th and start trying to be the first one off the plane, this will help you feel better! |
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2592283)
Not only that, you can’t compare a privately held airline to a publicly traded one. The VX investors were getting their money’s worth the whole time. Then they reaped the rewards heavily when they sold it to AS. I remember several times where management said we would’ve made money, but we had to make payments back to the investors. Then there’s the whole employee ownership scandal.
|
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2592323)
What no! Come on. You are actually really funny at times. You have to be a smart guy. You can’t really believe this. Stop, step away, you will end up stocking shelves at Walmart when you retire. You are smarter then this!
|
Don't you guys get tired of going back and forth?? Hell I'm tired reading all the banter.
|
This ^^^^^^^
(Filler) |
Originally Posted by IFlyEm
(Post 2592391)
Don't you guys get tired of going back and forth?? Hell I'm tired reading all the banter.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands