![]() |
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591956)
Funny guy. I hope you realize we're all in the dark over here. They're making changes and from this vantage point - it looks f*cking grim.
I'm sure it looks better from the top of the stack with 2500 guys and girls to cushion the fall, but nonetheless the master plan seems to be anything but. They just spent $2.5 billion on an airline to effectively dismantle it. That's insane from a business perspective. Talk about wasting resources. They say they wanted to compete in California, but all we're seeing is retreat. So you'll have to excuse my lack of humor on the matter. I've got life decisions to make. |
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591914)
You've been consistently ignorant throughout your short life here on APC - keeping the streak alive I see.
Here. Educate yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska...#Current_fleet 43 incoming orders. We have 63 A319/A320s. Hopefully you recognize that's about 20 short. I even used my fingers and toes. |
Doood, the biggest set back for us is that when people boarded Virgin for the first time, they said "Wow". We were something to be proud of. Now, were just alaska.
|
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2592161)
You are missing the fact that 1 900=1.5 319’s and 1.x 320’s etc. It will not be a 1:1 replacement.
|
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2592165)
As far as I know, an A319 and a B739 have the same amount of pilot seats. It's a net loss as far as career progression.
|
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2591956)
They just spent $2.5 billion on an airline to effectively dismantle it. That's insane from a business perspective.
|
Originally Posted by Ispeakjive
(Post 2592162)
Doood, the biggest set back for us is that when people boarded Virgin for the first time, they said "Wow". We were something to be proud of. Now, were just alaska.
|
Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
(Post 2592235)
Great. Those “Wow” people also didn’t pay your company enough to cover the costs. Everybody likes getting something for nothing but Alaska isn’t a Charity. I don’t care if our “guests” impressed or not. The vast majority just want to get where they’re going on time. Alaska Airlines is more than a sugar high and a cheeky ad campaign.
No dog in this, but I am a Cali guy... VX's financial trajectory was typical for a startup, especially given the timing (recession, oil spike). They clearly appeared to be on the right track to keep making money and more of it. Cali people loved the brand, their only complaint was that they didn't fly to more places. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2592275)
No dog in this, but I am a Cali guy...
VX's financial trajectory was typical for a startup, especially given the timing (recession, oil spike). They clearly appeared to be on the right track to keep making money and more of it. Cali people loved the brand, their only complaint was that they didn't fly to more places. |
Originally Posted by Ispeakjive
(Post 2592162)
Doood, the biggest set back for us is that when people boarded Virgin for the first time, they said "Wow". We were something to be proud of. Now, were just alaska.
I pegged you as a pretty smart person. A little negative but you always had a quick wit. What? you care about what? People getting off the plane, really, being proud? Ok, you will feel better if you care about the 5th and the 20th and start trying to be the first one off the plane, this will help you feel better! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands