Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Alaska (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/)
-   -   Terrible ethics (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/121058-terrible-ethics.html)

MarkThyme 04-10-2019 09:02 PM


Originally Posted by MusicPilot (Post 2800501)
Like losing almost 50% of your company’s value? 😂

I guess you could make that argument, but I don't know who would take you seriously. The stock price is down 40% from a wild peak at the end of 2016. But looking at the last 10 years, I'm seeing a return of about 1090%, which beats everybody except UAL by a hefty margin.

av8or 04-10-2019 11:18 PM


Originally Posted by MarkThyme (Post 2800410)
This is why I say airline pilots are idiots. They think the company revolves around them. Of course management does what's best for profitability. That's their job, and their duty to shareholders.

There’s two types of profitability models.... both are for shareholders. Herb Kelleher..... and Frank Lorenzo.
BOTH made lots of money for their shareholders and got very rich themselves in the process. You can both take care of employees AND make shareholders a tidy sum. It’s not a binary choice.

MusicPilot 04-11-2019 05:06 PM


Originally Posted by MarkThyme (Post 2800749)
I guess you could make that argument, but I don't know who would take you seriously. The stock price is down 40% from a wild peak at the end of 2016. But looking at the last 10 years, I'm seeing a return of about 1090%, which beats everybody except UAL by a hefty margin.

Investors don’t care about 10 years ago. When you lose 40% of their money “today”? - that’s what they care about. Add to to fact that there’s not really a plan to get that money back? Yeah, I think that something that’s taken seriously. Listen to the earnings calls and then dance around the investors questions.

hoover 04-14-2019 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by full of luv (Post 2798677)
A couple years ago, AS would send out an email inviting you to apply, then you'd get called by "smart recruiters" where you'd get the hard sell on why you really don't match up with AS just yet.....so you need to really consider Horizon for employment. It was like a bad time share proposal....but all the sell without the reward.

I got that call! I would tell them I have thousands of hrs as 737 PIC and I never applied nor would I at this point to Horizon. They kept telling me how great of a company it was and how I could get preferential hiring with AS if I went there. It was clear I wasn't being offered an interview with AS and thanked them for the call and politely declined.
I still get emails asking to update my application with AS. I'm assuming so I can be offered an interview with Horizon once again.
At the time I lived in Seattle and really wanted to work for AS. Never got the chance so I moved on. I wish all you guys luck and hopefully you can make it a place people will be happy at.

sailingfun 04-14-2019 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by Baradium (Post 2798543)
All Compass pilots that were hired and started class with a flow got the flow. Those that didn't get the flow started there knowing they weren't getting it.

Delta honored the flow for those NWA told we’re going to flow. They were not under a legal obligation to do so.

ImperialxRat 04-14-2019 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by hoover (Post 2802870)
I still get emails asking to update my application with AS. I'm assuming so I can be offered an interview with Horizon once again.

I got one last year asking me to update my info... been with Alaska 3 years now.

SeaRider 04-14-2019 05:28 PM

I got an email asking me to confirm my presence at an interview with Alaska two days later. Assuming I had missed a prior email, I inquired about later interview dates, but said I could make it if it couldn’t be moved. The next day, I jumped on an airplane to Seattle and when I landed, received an email stating that confirmation had been sent to the wrong person with my first name. Awesome sauce.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

full of luv 04-14-2019 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by SeaRider (Post 2803070)
I got an email asking me to confirm my presence at an interview with Alaska two days later. Assuming I had missed a prior email, I inquired about later interview dates, but said I could make it if it couldn’t be moved. The next day, I jumped on an airplane to Seattle and when I landed, received an email stating that confirmation had been sent to the wrong person with my first name. Awesome sauce.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That used to be Hawaiian's HR strategy in the early 2000's at least. Several in our squadron were called on a Monday at 4pm asking if they were interested in a Wed morning interview. If you said yes, well you were in the flow..... if you said no, they said, OK we'll contact you again when we're going to do interviews...... sometimes that call never came twice.

ELAC321 04-14-2019 10:12 PM


Originally Posted by Big ugly (Post 2803146)
What’s obvious is that we need; for the good of the union, our job security and our future contracts, is for hiring the union to be in control of the hiring. We cannot continue to allow the company to hire low time asswipes that fit the metrics of loving Alaska as Yes voters and enablers. If Alpa can’t manage this, maybe AFA can?

Sounds like you treat our new hires great! Get over yourself. If somebody is new and excited to be here great. Nice change from all the negativity.

Broey 04-15-2019 07:31 AM


Originally Posted by Big ugly (Post 2803146)
What’s obvious is that we need; for the good of the union, our job security and our future contracts, is for hiring the union to be in control of the hiring. We cannot continue to allow the company to hire low time asswipes that fit the metrics of loving Alaska as Yes voters and enablers. If Alpa can’t manage this, maybe AFA can?

What’s it like being such a miserable person?

Excargodog 04-15-2019 08:01 AM


Originally Posted by Big ugly (Post 2803146)
What’s obvious is that we need; for the good of the union, our job security and our future contracts, is for hiring the union to be in control of the hiring.

And what are you willing to give up in negotiations to get that? Considering the pilots have somehow never even been able to show enough willpower to hold out for scope I mean?

opdeliber 04-15-2019 10:53 AM

all this contract and uniform talk is irrelevant..there will never be another contract at alaska nor another uniform worn. it may not be announced in the next few months but the days using the alaska call sign are numbered.

Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 2803352)
And what are you willing to give up in negotiations to get that? Considering the pilots have somehow never even been able to show enough willpower to hold out for scope I mean?


NewGuy01 04-15-2019 12:24 PM

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...8c9ac6fcaf.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ShyGuy 04-15-2019 12:51 PM

I would not want the union to be in charge of pilot hiring. Many different issues, liability being one. Let management hire pilots like it’s done at every other company.


And while the truth may sting, the window opens for ~150 jobs for the year and ~3000 will apply. This place will have no problem filling up seats even with the current contract, and yes many locals will apply. We have leverage going forward, but I really hope the union doesn’t stand on retention or attracting pilots as an actual issue for Alaska. It’ll be no factor with how little AS hires compared to other airlines.

DENpilot 04-15-2019 05:48 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 2803515)
Let management hire pilots like it’s done at every other company.


What?!? I don't know whether to feel sorry for your ignorance or just laugh out loud.....

Baradium 04-15-2019 06:06 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 2803515)
I would not want the union to be in charge of pilot hiring. Many different issues, liability being one. Let management hire pilots like it’s done at every other company.


And while the truth may sting, the window opens for ~150 jobs for the year and ~3000 will apply. This place will have no problem filling up seats even with the current contract, and yes many locals will apply. We have leverage going forward, but I really hope the union doesn’t stand on retention or attracting pilots as an actual issue for Alaska. It’ll be no factor with how little AS hires compared to other airlines.

I don't really know anything about how it's done at Alaska, but pilots are heavily involved in the hiring process at DL.

DENpilot 04-15-2019 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by Baradium (Post 2803674)
I don't really know anything about how it's done at Alaska, but pilots are heavily involved in the hiring process at DL.

As is every other airline.... that dude is on some serious narcotics.... Who in the **** would want management being the sole source of pilot hiring? Oh, right... a management tool such as that a-dub...

ShyGuy 04-15-2019 07:44 PM

You know what I mean. The computer algorithms, the classified scoring matrix, psych, etc. Yes I realize pilots are also involved in hiring and interview on the hiring team.

Klsytakesit 04-15-2019 08:46 PM

At Alaska, for the last 20yrs anyway, pilots are allowed to be a part of hiring. Only as long as there are 5 applicants for every job. When it thins out HR runs the show. Management also uses pilot recruiters as internal reporters...Kinda spy like. The whole process is ultra sleazy but that is the norm....Alaska is not really the kind of airline where you care who they hire anyway


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands