|
Originally Posted by Mookie
(Post 3013798)
couldn't find one. Can you tell us where it is in Alaska’s world. Tx
|
Okay, just found it.
alaskasworld, covid subpages, latest news and updates, scroll down to more updates, further reducing our capacity dated March 25. 56% reduction of mainline. |
Originally Posted by Busdriver320
(Post 3014647)
Okay, just found it.
alaskasworld, covid subpages, latest news and updates, scroll down to more updates, further reducing our capacity dated March 25. 56% reduction of mainline. |
Originally Posted by av8or
(Post 3014294)
87 x 12 = 1044 which mean cutting 2/3 of the pilots.... unless I’m missing something
|
Originally Posted by NewGuy01
(Post 3014989)
I think many of us will be replaced by a SkyWest pilot flying an EMB-175. A scope clause never looked so good.
This Scopeless contract is just the gift that keeps on giving the whole year through Clark. |
Originally Posted by NewGuy01
(Post 3014989)
I think many of us will be replaced by a SkyWest pilot flying an EMB-175. A scope clause never looked so good.
This is just not true... The CSM for the 175 is to high to remain viable. Alaska management knows the need at least 180 NB on the back end of this to make it. The 175 can plug short term holes but are not a long term solution. |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 3015021)
This is just not true... The CSM for the 175 is to high to remain viable. Alaska management knows the need at least 180 NB on the back end of this to make it. The 175 can plug short term holes but are not a long term solution.
Cheers - Rob. |
Originally Posted by rballan
(Post 3015080)
True. CASM on E175 is probably double a B737. If the mainline fleet on the other side of this is 180, AS will have way too many E175s (62TOT/30 HRZ/32 SKW).
Cheers - Rob. Why do we have 175s with Horizon crews flying from Seattle to Kansas City then? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Because the company cannot instantly make every change required, the moment it’s necessary. It’s a process, not an event.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Ok I’ll try again:
If we have 60 bookings going to Kansas City from Seattle in October who do you think will fly it? Horizon or Alaska? Why do we have the strategy of developing a market with a 175 and then switching to a 737 when the bookings allow? It’s cheaper to run a 175 when you don’t have a full aircraft. And the bottom 1/2 of the seniority will suffer for it. Not that the majority of the pilots in the last 1000 seniority numbers left at AS will care. They didn’t ask for scope and during the last furlough they were picking up premium. I listened to the guys who were furloughed last time when I flew with them on reserve. It’s every man for himself at AS when times are hard. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands