![]() |
SLI question from an AA guy.
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!
|
It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.
This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI |
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3084849)
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by LonesomeSky
(Post 3084879)
It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.
This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI |
Both sides actually gained longevity and relative seniority. Truly spectacular job by the arbitrators.
|
Originally Posted by LonesomeSky
(Post 3084879)
It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.
This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI |
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3084849)
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by LonesomeSky
(Post 3084879)
It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.
This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk |
None of us even care where we ended up on the list. We're just happy to be together.
|
We're too busy processing the small amount of lunatics from each airline now on one list.
I seriously believe we could have a successful GoFundme campaign where we give them double their planned retirement to just go away. |
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3084849)
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!
|
I’m honestly not trying to troll. I just really have no idea how it ended up. With Alaska joining One World next year and AA starting India, China, and UK out of Seattle, I’m starting to smell a possible merger. I’m interested to know how the younger/newer Virgin America was slotted in to Alaska. I’d imagine it wasn’t straight relative seniority.
|
SLI question from an AA guy.
Why do these always have to merge? Why can’t we just sell tickets on each other? Alaska has a good balance sheet and will recover before us. They have the same market cap in spite of their relatively small size and regional niche. Doug will pull out the merger papers if he is cornered, but not yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3085906)
I’m honestly not trying to troll. I just really have no idea how it ended up. With Alaska joining One World next year and AA starting India, China, and UK out of Seattle, I’m starting to smell a possible merger. I’m interested to know how the younger/newer Virgin America was slotted in to Alaska. I’d imagine it wasn’t straight relative seniority.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3086001)
I answered your question on the previous page. You just missed that?
I guess I was looking for more of an explanation. 60/40 only tells a little bit of the story. |
Originally Posted by bababouey
(Post 3085920)
Why do these always have to merge? Why can’t we just sell tickets on each other? Alaska has a good balance sheet and will recover before us. They have the same market cap in spite of their relatively small size and regional niche. Doug will pull out the merger papers if he is cornered, but not yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Would someone be willing to share the award list?
|
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3086035)
Would someone be willing to share the award list?
|
My recollection was top 1/3 of VX took approx. 22% reduction in relative seniority, next 1/3 a lesser amount, and bottom 1/3 basically DOH.
I would assume that in any subsequent merger the former VX pilots would be "stovepiped" as their current seniority numbers are not reflective of straight DOH or YOS. Cheers - Rob. |
Originally Posted by HulkaBurger
(Post 3086039)
No........
Tough crowd...... Let’s just all prey that mergers are over. |
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3086190)
Tough crowd...... Let’s just all prey that mergers are over.
|
Originally Posted by bababouey
(Post 3085920)
Why do these always have to merge? Why can’t we just sell tickets on each other? Alaska has a good balance sheet and will recover before us. They have the same market cap in spite of their relatively small size and regional niche. Doug will pull out the merger papers if he is cornered, but not yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3086190)
Tough crowd...... Let’s just all prey that mergers are over.
|
Originally Posted by beancounter
(Post 3086235)
it doesn’t appear that a merger is on the near horizon. The plan for the nexts several years appears to be that we will provide the heavy lift on the west coast as international travel slowly recovers and Alaska will provide feed in SEA, SFO, and possibly PDX. I think Alaska is a great airline, but another merger? Argghhh, I’ve been through enough already.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3086245)
Tough crowd? You, an anonymous person on the internet, want a list of pilots with 3,000+ names, hire dates, and birthdates. :rolleyes:
Well.... we openly shared everything on the internet during our integration. I just figured you guys would have posted the final award as well. No worries. Hopefully it won’t matter anyway. |
Originally Posted by 9mikemike
(Post 3086254)
Word from flight operations for us is the closure of the SFO pilot/flight attendant base as we transition to a single fleet....would expect American to fill in what little traffic we have there in SFO. PDX is notthing more than a wide spot in the road. I think we will feed you guys heavily in SEA and LAX...Thats about it
|
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
(Post 3086283)
Well.... we openly shared everything on the internet during our integration. I just figured you guys would have posted the final award as well. No worries. Hopefully it won’t matter anyway.
And there’s no point in looking at past SLI cases and thinking it’ll apply here. Plenty of guys tried that here thinking it would follow a “historic” reference of much higher weighting of status/category and much lower weighting of longevity. It ended up being the opposite, and much more closer to Alaska’s proposal. |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3086440)
It ended up being the opposite, and much more closer to Alaska’s proposal.
Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired. |
Originally Posted by RkyMtnFlyer
(Post 3086228)
In terms of mergers one can attempt to “pray” & one can feel like “prey”...either way it still ends with arbitration.
|
Just imagine where AT pilots would be today, and on 1 Oct if they hadn't been acquired. That may help you in letting it go.
|
Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123
(Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....
Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired. Respectfully, I’m not taking the bait. Good day :) |
Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123
(Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....
Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired. Are we really gonna start this tit for tat stuff (pc) again? It happened... no one was happy with the outcome... let’s move on. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by av8or
(Post 3086341)
“Most West Coast”...... slogan of the decade. 😂😂😂😂
|
Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123
(Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....
Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired. |
Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123
(Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....
Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired. |
Originally Posted by Caveman
(Post 3086987)
Just imagine where AT pilots would be today, and on 1 Oct if they hadn't been acquired. That may help you in letting it go.
|
Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123
(Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....
Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired. |
:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123
(Post 3087796)
:rolleyes:
What a tool. |
Originally Posted by WhaleSurfing
(Post 3087317)
Touché! That guy will be sitting in a rest home still whining. Air Tran would have been long gone by now.
#arroganceatthelotteryoffice |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands