Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Alaska (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/)
-   -   SLI question from an AA guy. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/130259-sli-question-aa-guy.html)

AUpilot1 07-02-2020 10:54 AM

SLI question from an AA guy.
 
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!

LonesomeSky 07-02-2020 11:44 AM

It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.

This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI

AK22 07-02-2020 12:18 PM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3084849)
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!

Wow! Troll much?

beancounter 07-02-2020 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by LonesomeSky (Post 3084879)
It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.

This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI

Hey, that's awesome! It sounds like it went just like ours. We're all over here singing Kumbaya and roasting marshmellows!

ELAC321 07-02-2020 02:19 PM

Both sides actually gained longevity and relative seniority. Truly spectacular job by the arbitrators.

NewGuy01 07-02-2020 02:59 PM


Originally Posted by LonesomeSky (Post 3084879)
It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.

This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI

Post of the year for AS forums.

ShyGuy 07-02-2020 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3084849)
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!

60% longevity, 40% status category, harmony model.

miker1 07-02-2020 07:56 PM


Originally Posted by LonesomeSky (Post 3084879)
It was a total success. We came out more unified than ever. Pilots from both sides brought incredible experience and insights. We're 3000 brothers and sisters working towards improving our contract.



This is our SLI ia nutshell: https://youtu.be/e23SotgestI

Made my day

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Ohio 07-03-2020 01:55 AM

None of us even care where we ended up on the list. We're just happy to be together.

Dolphinflyer 07-03-2020 06:16 AM

We're too busy processing the small amount of lunatics from each airline now on one list.

I seriously believe we could have a successful GoFundme campaign where we give them double their planned retirement to just go away.

9mikemike 07-03-2020 10:10 PM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3084849)
Hey guys, just curious how the SLI ended up. I did a search on here and all I saw were proposals from both sides. Did it go relative? Who made out better? Thanks!

Not really a topic of conversation....When we finish shrinking by 30% this fall it will likely become one. We appear to be headed back to a single fleet and back to the original 4 bases...At that point it will be a bit ugly

AUpilot1 07-04-2020 04:39 AM

I’m honestly not trying to troll. I just really have no idea how it ended up. With Alaska joining One World next year and AA starting India, China, and UK out of Seattle, I’m starting to smell a possible merger. I’m interested to know how the younger/newer Virgin America was slotted in to Alaska. I’d imagine it wasn’t straight relative seniority.

bababouey 07-04-2020 05:06 AM

SLI question from an AA guy.
 
Why do these always have to merge? Why can’t we just sell tickets on each other? Alaska has a good balance sheet and will recover before us. They have the same market cap in spite of their relatively small size and regional niche. Doug will pull out the merger papers if he is cornered, but not yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ShyGuy 07-04-2020 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3085906)
I’m honestly not trying to troll. I just really have no idea how it ended up. With Alaska joining One World next year and AA starting India, China, and UK out of Seattle, I’m starting to smell a possible merger. I’m interested to know how the younger/newer Virgin America was slotted in to Alaska. I’d imagine it wasn’t straight relative seniority.

I answered your question on the previous page. You just missed that?

AUpilot1 07-04-2020 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 3086001)
I answered your question on the previous page. You just missed that?


I guess I was looking for more of an explanation. 60/40 only tells a little bit of the story.

rickair7777 07-04-2020 08:11 AM


Originally Posted by bababouey (Post 3085920)
Why do these always have to merge? Why can’t we just sell tickets on each other? Alaska has a good balance sheet and will recover before us. They have the same market cap in spite of their relatively small size and regional niche. Doug will pull out the merger papers if he is cornered, but not yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The alaska management team is not going to sell their company to Doug, at least not for any amount he could afford in the mid-term. They like their jobs. Any mutual merger deal would have to be on terms favorable to AS manager careers.

AUpilot1 07-04-2020 08:37 AM

Would someone be willing to share the award list?

HulkaBurger 07-04-2020 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3086035)
Would someone be willing to share the award list?

No........

rballan 07-04-2020 08:53 AM

My recollection was top 1/3 of VX took approx. 22% reduction in relative seniority, next 1/3 a lesser amount, and bottom 1/3 basically DOH.

I would assume that in any subsequent merger the former VX pilots would be "stovepiped" as their current seniority numbers are not reflective of straight DOH or YOS.

Cheers - Rob.

AUpilot1 07-04-2020 03:36 PM


Originally Posted by HulkaBurger (Post 3086039)
No........


Tough crowd...... Let’s just all prey that mergers are over.

RkyMtnFlyer 07-04-2020 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3086190)
Tough crowd...... Let’s just all prey that mergers are over.

In terms of mergers one can attempt to “pray” & one can feel like “prey”...either way it still ends with arbitration.

beancounter 07-04-2020 07:20 PM


Originally Posted by bababouey (Post 3085920)
Why do these always have to merge? Why can’t we just sell tickets on each other? Alaska has a good balance sheet and will recover before us. They have the same market cap in spite of their relatively small size and regional niche. Doug will pull out the merger papers if he is cornered, but not yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

it doesn’t appear that a merger is on the near horizon. The plan for the nexts several years appears to be that we will provide the heavy lift on the west coast as international travel slowly recovers and Alaska will provide feed in SEA, SFO, and possibly PDX. I think Alaska is a great airline, but another merger? Argghhh, I’ve been through enough already.

ShyGuy 07-04-2020 08:31 PM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3086190)
Tough crowd...... Let’s just all prey that mergers are over.

Tough crowd? You, an anonymous person on the internet, want a list of pilots with 3,000+ names, hire dates, and birthdates. :rolleyes:

9mikemike 07-04-2020 09:26 PM


Originally Posted by beancounter (Post 3086235)
it doesn’t appear that a merger is on the near horizon. The plan for the nexts several years appears to be that we will provide the heavy lift on the west coast as international travel slowly recovers and Alaska will provide feed in SEA, SFO, and possibly PDX. I think Alaska is a great airline, but another merger? Argghhh, I’ve been through enough already.

Word from flight operations for us is the closure of the SFO pilot/flight attendant base as we transition to a single fleet....would expect American to fill in what little traffic we have there in SFO. PDX is notthing more than a wide spot in the road. I think we will feed you guys heavily in SEA and LAX...Thats about it

AUpilot1 07-05-2020 04:57 AM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 3086245)
Tough crowd? You, an anonymous person on the internet, want a list of pilots with 3,000+ names, hire dates, and birthdates. :rolleyes:


Well.... we openly shared everything on the internet during our integration. I just figured you guys would have posted the final award as well. No worries. Hopefully it won’t matter anyway.

av8or 07-05-2020 06:58 AM


Originally Posted by 9mikemike (Post 3086254)
Word from flight operations for us is the closure of the SFO pilot/flight attendant base as we transition to a single fleet....would expect American to fill in what little traffic we have there in SFO. PDX is notthing more than a wide spot in the road. I think we will feed you guys heavily in SEA and LAX...Thats about it

“Most West Coast”...... slogan of the decade. 😂😂😂😂

ShyGuy 07-05-2020 10:07 AM


Originally Posted by AUpilot1 (Post 3086283)
Well.... we openly shared everything on the internet during our integration. I just figured you guys would have posted the final award as well. No worries. Hopefully it won’t matter anyway.

I don’t recall seeing the final seniority list published on APC. Only the methodology breakdown, and you got that already.



And there’s no point in looking at past SLI cases and thinking it’ll apply here. Plenty of guys tried that here thinking it would follow a “historic” reference of much higher weighting of status/category and much lower weighting of longevity. It ended up being the opposite, and much more closer to Alaska’s proposal.

MiLtoMajor123 07-06-2020 09:18 AM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 3086440)
It ended up being the opposite, and much more closer to Alaska’s proposal.

I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....

Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired.

WHACKMASTER 07-06-2020 09:54 AM


Originally Posted by RkyMtnFlyer (Post 3086228)
In terms of mergers one can attempt to “pray” & one can feel like “prey”...either way it still ends with arbitration.

Not if you get “AirTraned”.

Caveman 07-06-2020 11:00 AM

Just imagine where AT pilots would be today, and on 1 Oct if they hadn't been acquired. That may help you in letting it go.

ShyGuy 07-06-2020 12:36 PM


Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 (Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....

Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired.



Respectfully, I’m not taking the bait. Good day :)

fucius 07-06-2020 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 (Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....

Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired.


Are we really gonna start this tit for tat stuff (pc) again? It happened... no one was happy with the outcome... let’s move on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Outdoors 07-06-2020 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by av8or (Post 3086341)
“Most West Coast”...... slogan of the decade. 😂😂😂😂

Dont forget DECADE OF AWESOME or something like that

9mikemike 07-06-2020 07:37 PM


Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 (Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....

Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired.

Not part of the discussion but if you think your basket-weaving degree from State U is a qualification think again. We furloughed so Wall St. would reward us. And because we created a large training bubble for the MD 80....Have flown with 100’s of former VX pilots....All very qualified in 121 ops....

jayme 07-06-2020 11:22 PM


Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 (Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....

Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired.

Happy AUpilot1? You had to know some dick would take the bait.

WhaleSurfing 07-07-2020 06:49 AM


Originally Posted by Caveman (Post 3086987)
Just imagine where AT pilots would be today, and on 1 Oct if they hadn't been acquired. That may help you in letting it go.

Touché! That guy will be sitting in a rest home still whining. Air Tran would have been long gone by now.

ExFokkerFlyer 07-07-2020 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 (Post 3086925)
I mean when one side isn't afraid of being destroyed by the panel....and shoots for the moon and the other side makes a more conservative proposal thinking they will get punished for trying to bully a smaller pilot group....

Bottom line....no protections for furloughed Alaska Pilots while VA was hiring less qualified applicants during the Alaska furlough. The first VA guy on the list bumped a guy at Alaska who had 18 years at Alaska before VA hired it's first pilot. I think VA guys made out pretty good all considering. And we all got an early pay raise which now looks even better given our current situation. Yes its in the past....but former VA guys aren't going to convince the pilot group that they got a raw deal with the SLI. Of course things like adjusting to Alaska's schedule and the closure of the JFK base were major blows to VA guys....but thems are the breaks when your company opens itself up to being acquired.

LESS qualified? You don’t have a clue as to what you are talking about, that renders the rest of your statement moot.

MiLtoMajor123 07-07-2020 11:06 PM

:rolleyes:

Wingnutt 07-08-2020 08:37 AM


Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 (Post 3087796)
:rolleyes:


What a tool.

Huell 07-08-2020 08:43 AM


Originally Posted by WhaleSurfing (Post 3087317)
Touché! That guy will be sitting in a rest home still whining. Air Tran would have been long gone by now.

If I remember correctly, the Valuejet ... I mean "airtran" ... guys would have been better off taking the first offer as suggested by one of the guys on the mec... Instead they shot that down and the second offer was not quite as good.

#arroganceatthelotteryoffice


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands