Airline Pilot Central Forums - Alaska Blue and a LUV triangle

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)

- Alaska (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/)

- - Alaska Blue and a LUV triangle (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/130417-alaska-blue-luv-triangle.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 3093370)

Internet tough guy... I hope one day our paths cross my friend. You would cower like a child in my presence, this I guarantee!

“You would cower like a child in my presence...”???!!!

😂😂😂😂 Ya kill me sometimes dude. 😂

Quote:

Originally Posted by av8or (Post 3093413)

“You would cower like a child in my presence...”???!!!

😂😂😂😂 Ya kill me sometimes dude. 😂

I don’t know any of you guys but I instantly thought of this scene when I read otz’s post.
You’d think there were ten of me...

Quote:

Originally Posted by todd1200 (Post 3093402)

The JB MEC gave temporary scope relief for mgmt to enter a codeshare agreement with AA in exchange for no furloughs. No way they would just give away scope to allow RJs, etc.

I know guys there and have discussed it. They think that IF a merger were in the works which would benefit JB pilots, they might agree to an allowance for EXISTING regional flying inherited from a merger partner. Some potential mergers would be worth it.

Only reasonable, a pilot group might cokblock a merger by standing on scope provisions if so desired, but they could never force the immediate elimination of existing regional flying... far too costly, it would just kill the deal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by av8or (Post 3093413)

“You would cower like a child in my presence...”???!!!

😂😂😂😂 Ya kill me sometimes dude. 😂

Words fail me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by todd1200 (Post 3093402)

The JB MEC gave temporary scope relief for mgmt to enter a codeshare agreement with AA in exchange for no furloughs. No way they would just give away scope to allow RJs, etc.

I was told the scope relief is only for regional jets flown for the perspective merger partner and relief is only given if the merger actually takes place.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3093439)

A B6+AS merger would need to go like this for me to be ok with it: basically all 4100 B6 pilots and all 3100 (or however many) AS pilots merge with relative seniority. QX pilots would then be stapled to the bottom, but could keep their CA seat for 2 years. Their longevity would likely either reset or be capped. E175s would fall under B6’s E190 family rates. Q400...not sure what to do with that, it’d have to be in house. Rates negotiable. SkyWest flying would be ended. B6 scope would basically have to be verbatim in the hypothetical JCBA.

Quote:

Originally Posted by otzeagle1 (Post 3093445)

i was told the scope relief is only for regional jets flown for the perspective merger partner and relief is only given if the merger actually takes place.

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Quote:

Originally Posted by HulkaBurger (Post 3093365)

Get lost, jackass.

Everytime this dude writes, he only screams, “I’m a MORON”, for everyone to hear. I can’t think of one coherent thing he has ever written.

Quote:

Originally Posted by disenchantMINT (Post 3093451)

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

I would give the JetBlue rumor a 7/10... does anyone over there know what you gave up for the no furlough clause?

The SWA rumor a 8/10
and the AAL rumor a 9/10

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 3093456)

I would give the JetBlue rumor a 7/10... does anyone over there know what you gave up for the no furlough clause?

The SWA rumor a 8/10
and the AAL rumor a 9/10

Yeah...not much was given up by B6. A 1 time relief for entering a code share that’s otherwise prohibited due to the fact that we aren’t hiring and are reducing block hours. ALV lowered from 74 to below 70. Line holder min guarantee stays at 70 hours. Reserve guarantee dropped from 75 to 70, with 2 additional days off. Auto snap back May 1st, or if flying reaches 80% of previous levels.