![]() |
Potentially no California crew bases
Alaska Airlines Update:
Alaska Airlines is threatening to close its California crew bases after Supreme Court rules that Flight Attendants have a right to meal and rest breaks. Source: https://rb.gy/orxbtv So only the cabin crew get a meal break and not the front end? Last I heard the meal break was called the long sit or if one was really desperate the quick turn. Guess Scarf down a sandwich while programming the box is the new normal. |
Originally Posted by FAR121
(Post 3463058)
Alaska Airlines Update:
Alaska Airlines is threatening to close its California crew bases after Supreme Court rules that Flight Attendants have a right to meal and rest breaks. Source: https://rb.gy/orxbtv So only the cabin crew get a meal break and not the front end? Last I heard the meal break was called the long sit or if one was really desperate the quick turn. Guess Scarf down a sandwich while programming the box is the new normal. |
Every major airline has a presence in California, and only one is threatening thousands of its employees with upending their lives.
Even if it's only posturing, it's sh*tty. It's par for the course. And I'm absolutely sick of it. |
Maybe it’s part of the plan to reduce carbon emissions.
|
This law is ridiculous to begin with. So any flight out of California is supposed to land after 5 hours or whatever it is to give everyone a break? How would you do any flights heading over the Pacific, the law as it supposedly reads mean they have to be free to get off the plane.
|
Originally Posted by HotDogWater
(Post 3463192)
This law is ridiculous to begin with. So any flight out of California is supposed to land after 5 hours or whatever it is to give everyone a break? How would you do any flights heading over the Pacific, the law as it supposedly reads mean they have to be free to get off the plane.
FTA, here is the part of the law that Alaska Airlines doesn't want people to read: If an employer fails to provide an employee a meal period in accordance with an applicable IWC Order, the employer must pay one additional hour of pay at the employee's regular rate of pay for each workday that the meal period is not provided. It's truly in character for Alaska Airlines to not only be indignantly opposed to having to pay the cost of doing business, but to also obfuscate the truth and completely misrepresent the situation. |
Read the Q&A, that is addressed in it. The intent is the 1 hr pay is supposed to be for exceptions to a missed break. Not for regularly (purposefully) scheduling of missing breaks. So that isn’t a solution for airlines.
|
But Alaska Care Lines
|
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3463080)
I hate to say it but this stuff is long overdue. Airlines want to treat crews like robots. Yes, you can push captain authority and delay things to eat but you can't play that card everyday.
So when it’s your break time as a pilot, a 3rd pilot comes into your seat, while you go back to a blocked off seat in 1st class to eat your re-heated leftovers you brought from home in the cooler next to all the Passengers? Uh, no thanks… |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3463219)
Read the Q&A, that is addressed in it. The intent is the 1 hr pay is supposed to be for exceptions to a missed break. Not for regularly (purposefully) scheduling of missing breaks. So that isn’t a solution for airlines.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:40 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands