340.25
#11
Banned
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 825
Likes: 1
#12
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
MAGIC!
#13
On Reserve
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 114
Likes: 5
From: 737 CA
Uhh this was exactly the intended design. Nobody seriously thought 3 airlines would still be negotiating. The language was intended to keep our rates in the mix. Perhaps you'd rather be in SWA shoes? No thanks for me. I'm still with the 82%.
#14
Banned
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 825
Likes: 1
#15
Banned
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
his small mind thinks SWA will get full retro.
#17
Banned
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
not wasn’t a lack of imagination it was what they could negotiate. Not sure why I think you could possibly understand that simple concept.
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 683
Likes: 18
It was what they negotiated because they knew you, along with everyone who was terrified of a recession or were too impatient to wait for the language we deserved, would vote yes for it even though it had the potential to end up functionally useless. Not sure why I think you could possibly understand that simple concept.



