Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Alaska (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/)
-   -   Alaska Air Hiring (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/77824-alaska-air-hiring.html)

Flynndawg 07-23-2018 02:06 PM

Don’t kid yourselves. Angle Lake knows exactly what they are doing.
The buses were gone before the ink was dry. They are just waiting for the right time to break the news. Can’t announce something like that during summer or holiday travel seasons. They know sick calls will go through the roof. Damage control.

MusicPilot 07-23-2018 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by Flynndawg (Post 2641082)
Don’t kid yourselves. Angle Lake knows exactly what they are doing.
The buses were gone before the ink was dry. They are just waiting for the right time to break the news. Can’t announce something like that during summer or holiday travel seasons. They know sick calls will go through the roof. Damage control.

Sure about that? A reliable birdy said the bean counters love the 321. I don’t think they know what to do. I think they thought it was a slam dunk with Boeing, but then reality set in.

Flynndawg 07-23-2018 03:04 PM

Not sure about anything. Just going off past experience. I personally would like to see the 321 stick around. Good looking airplane and seems as advertised.

waterboy 07-23-2018 10:19 PM


Originally Posted by MusicPilot (Post 2641098)
Sure about that? A reliable birdy said the bean counters love the 321. I don’t think they know what to do. I think they thought it was a slam dunk with Boeing, but then reality set in.

That is correct. But even though they love the 321, my guess is they have no desire to run 2 fleet types at this regional airline. It will only be used as leverage to get the price they want for the Boeings.

rickair7777 07-24-2018 06:05 AM


Originally Posted by waterboy (Post 2641329)
That is correct. But even though they love the 321, my guess is they have no desire to run 2 fleet types at this regional airline. It will only be used as leverage to get the price they want for the Boeings.

Realistically, they are probably not big enough to justify the overhead on two fleet types... unless they're going to merge again.

FLYLOW22 07-24-2018 12:38 PM


Originally Posted by Jetlife (Post 2639033)
Alaska meets the definition of a legacy, and a major. It does NOT meet the definition of a regional. Lets just clear that up. Your definitions are not really officially recognized terms. There is no "major national" and technically Alaska, JB and SWA go international. BTW all the airlines you listed are majors by definition.... Not sure why we keep trying to muddy waters with weird and nonstandard definitions.

Size of the airline has been a much more effective (unfortunately) tool in determining pay than labeling it a national, major or legacy ever has.



Lol...

If you have to explain it...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ispeakjive 07-25-2018 11:50 PM

ALK is a regional.
https://www.worldairlineawards.com/w...airlines-2018/

ForeverJunior 07-26-2018 06:25 AM

Curb your enthusiasm about that 4% growth next year. Tilden mentioned in his E-Mail this morning that they are cutting that back to 2%.

rickair7777 07-26-2018 06:35 AM


Originally Posted by Ispeakjive (Post 2642553)

In the context of this, Regional means a certain region of the world, ie a continent or two vice global flag carriers. This is not about commuter airlines.

Flaps1check 07-26-2018 07:42 AM


Originally Posted by ForeverJunior (Post 2642646)
Curb your enthusiasm about that 4% growth next year. Tilden mentioned in his E-Mail this morning that they are cutting that back to 2%.

The old shrink to profitability model. Seems to have worked all over the industries history.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands