Search

Notices

Delta blinks (again)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2016 | 08:50 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mike734
Delta puts expansion plans at Sea-Tac on hold | KIRO-TV

I recall some of us talking about the lack of gate space and other infrastructure issues a few years ago when Delta started down this road. I still think buying Alaska is the best way for Delta to take over SEATAC.
You do understand that a large number of the passengers arriving on the Delta international flights connect on Alaska? That means less flights equals fewer jobs at Alaska. This also has no bearing on domestic expansion. The current plan is for SEA to be the first C100 base.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 09:20 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by F15Cricket
Except in JNU!
It's so cute how protective some of you are over one city...
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 09:22 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WhatNow
You do understand that a large number of the passengers arriving on the Delta international flights connect on Alaska? That means less flights equals fewer jobs at Alaska. This also has no bearing on domestic expansion. The current plan is for SEA to be the first C100 base.
Just talked to one of the SEA tech ops big wigs recently. He said SEA is planned to double in size once everything is completed, terminal and customs.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 03:25 PM
  #14  
F15Cricket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat 737, Front seat T-6
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto
Just talked to one of the SEA tech ops big wigs recently. He said SEA is planned to double in size once everything is completed, terminal and customs.
So, that's what, about 8-10 years?! And there is no way there will be that many more gates, and the runways cannot handle that much more traffic. I think your tech ops dude is dreaming ...
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 03:51 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by F15Cricket
So, that's what, about 8-10 years?! And there is no way there will be that many more gates, and the runways cannot handle that much more traffic. I think your tech ops dude is dreaming ...
If you want to believe that go ahead. Delta has already said SEA will grow, the cseries are going there and international will grow once a new customs facility is built.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 04:40 PM
  #16  
MusicPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Driving a Bus for Recreational Pleasure.
Default

If you build it they will come.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 04:56 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto
If you want to believe that go ahead. Delta has already said SEA will grow, the cseries are going there and international will grow once a new customs facility is built.
If it does turn out to be true that SEA will be the first C-Series base, it'll be a big middle finger to Boeing, too. Intentional or not, that's a bold move.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 05:43 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta
If it does turn out to be true that SEA will be the first C-Series base, it'll be a big middle finger to Boeing, too. Intentional or not, that's a bold move.
I think AK buying an all airbus airline and potentially operating them is more of a middle finger.

No different than if the E190s showed up and went to SEA as planned.
I like to think if Boeing cared so much then we would have had a Boeing order.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 05:45 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto
I think AK buying an all airbus airline and potentially operating them is more of a middle finger.

No different than if the E190s showed up and went to SEA as planned.
I like to think if Boeing cared so much then we would have had a Boeing order.
please stop using logic
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 06:25 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto
I think AK buying an all airbus airline and potentially operating them is more of a middle finger.
Not much Alaska could control regarding VA's fleet type. My money is that Alaska most likely will replace those Airbuses with Boeing once they start timing out. Our decision to go with Bombardier is more intentional.

That being said, I think United forced our hand when they ordered those extra 737-700 NGs thereby most likely selling out the remaining order slots before Boeing goes all MAX.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices