![]() |
Originally Posted by Be Realistic
(Post 3381500)
I don't have a problem with the multi day trips. I may even bid for a few for the adventure. But now G4 is like any other airline and needs to pay like every other airline. There should never have been a contract that didn't foresee this happening. Now we will receive the bad end of the stick until a new contract appears in 2024/2025
|
Originally Posted by Be Realistic
(Post 3381500)
I don't have a problem with the multi day trips. I may even bid for a few for the adventure. But now G4 is like any other airline and needs to pay like every other airline. There should never have been a contract that didn't foresee this happening. Now we will receive the bad end of the stick until a new contract appears in 2024/2025
|
Originally Posted by FreshWater
(Post 3381511)
It always was just another airline. .
|
Originally Posted by flydiamond
(Post 3381456)
By building pairings in 3 leg days instead of 2 leg days. That was the expectation.
This times 1000. 3 leg days are efficient and keep the trips efficient for us while allowing more efficient scheduling in the outstation. Whether those are single or multi day 3 leg trips, is irrelevant. This is the point where scheduling the airline in Excel is killing the company and us. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3381523)
"Just another ****ing airline" - Maury Gallagher, 2012
|
Originally Posted by FreshWater
(Post 3381537)
Cursing at your pilots. Who does that?
|
Here’s the thing…
Allegiant didn’t choose the “home every night” model as a perk or benefit to their pilots. They chose it because it saves money on hotel, travel, perdiem, etc.
So, rather than ethically sharing some of those savings with their labor force via higher compensation, bonuses, incentive pay, etc., they pitch the concept as a BENEFIT to the flight crew as a reason to pay LESS. Furthermore it has been established as a carrot to be used carte blanche to counter any negative realities about working here. “BUT…you’re home every night!” The pilot group should be using the same logic to ARGUE FOR higher pay. The company saves on operating costs AND wage costs due to this model, and we’re dumb enough to let them leverage it as a reason to pay us less. There’s a toxic culture here against the pilots, and it was a large part of my motivation to leave. I know every airline has its problems, but I’m choosing to not give years of my life working for a company that openly loathes the people that allow them to exist as an airline. |
Originally Posted by Greybush
(Post 3381601)
Allegiant didn’t choose the “home every night” model as a perk or benefit to their pilots. They chose it because it saves money on hotel, travel, perdiem, etc.
So, rather than ethically sharing some of those savings with their labor force via higher compensation, bonuses, incentive pay, etc., they pitch the concept as a BENEFIT to the flight crew as a reason to pay LESS. Furthermore it has been established as a carrot to be used carte blanche to counter any negative realities about working here. “BUT…you’re home every night!” The pilot group should be using the same logic to ARGUE FOR higher pay. The company saves on operating costs AND wage costs due to this model, and we’re dumb enough to let them leverage it as a reason to pay us less. There’s a toxic culture here against the pilots, and it was a large part of my motivation to leave. I know every airline has its problems, but I’m choosing to not give years of my life working for a company that openly loathes the people that allow them to exist as an airline. Glad you were able to leave. It's always easier to cut and run but I don't blame anyone for doing it right now. |
Originally Posted by Greybush
(Post 3381601)
Allegiant didn’t choose the “home every night” model as a perk or benefit to their pilots. They chose it because it saves money on hotel, travel, perdiem, etc.
So, rather than ethically sharing some of those savings with their labor force via higher compensation, bonuses, incentive pay, etc., they pitch the concept as a BENEFIT to the flight crew as a reason to pay LESS. Furthermore it has been established as a carrot to be used carte blanche to counter any negative realities about working here. “BUT…you’re home every night!” The pilot group should be using the same logic to ARGUE FOR higher pay. The company saves on operating costs AND wage costs due to this model, and we’re dumb enough to let them leverage it as a reason to pay us less. There’s a toxic culture here against the pilots, and it was a large part of my motivation to leave. I know every airline has its problems, but I’m choosing to not give years of my life working for a company that openly loathes the people that allow them to exist as an airline. For example if you are unable to get home each calendar night you are compensated an additional 5 credit per calendar day away from home to existing credit of trip. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3381608)
No offense dude but you worked here maybe a minute in the grand scheme of things and you're lecturing pilots who have been here a decade on the way things are at this company. That's pure comedy.
Glad you were able to leave. It's always easier to cut and run but I don't blame anyone for doing it right now. And I wasn’t necessarily lecturing the 10-year pilots but the new guys considering this place. But also maybe a little to the 10-year pilots as well because whatever they’ve been doing clearly isn’t working to change things. What I do see having some effect is enough of us leaving could possibly change things for you guys for the better, so in that regard, you’re welcome 😉 |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands