![]() |
I’m wearing a combination of TH pants and MH blazer. The MH pants were too small, but I’ve outgrown my TH blazer. Color is very similar
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2684920)
This is why we can’t have nice things. To everyone here that wears TH you’re a moron.
The M&H stuff is absolute crap unless your BMI is above 28. Then it "fits". Quality is still low end though. |
The shirts are garbage...they fit like you’re wearing a big dogs clothing line. The pants are like wearing a heavy blanket and Look sloppy. Only decent thing that feels right is the blazer. Cut above here I come.
|
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2684999)
The reason we can't have nice things is because people refuse to look at facts and instead concoct this crazy conspiracy that TH is "poisoning" them. If TH is toxic so is M&H and Lands End. They all have met and passed the same tough standards even in random tests done by the APFA.
The M&H stuff is absolute crap unless your BMI is above 28. Then it "fits". Quality is still low end though. |
I tailored the M&H pants at my own cost. $15 per pant and the legs were brought in. Looks OK now. But that makes them $100 pants if I were to have to replace them. I'm sorry but that is just outrageous to ask employees to spend that sort of money on their uniform. And that still doesn't address the lower end look and quality of the uniform itself.
|
Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
(Post 2684787)
Call them and get a difference size. Quick turnaround, excellent customer service.
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2684920)
This is why we can’t have nice things. To everyone here that wears TH you’re a moron.
[emoji23][emoji23] |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2684999)
The reason we can't have nice things is because people refuse to look at facts and instead concoct this crazy conspiracy that TH is "poisoning" them. If TH is toxic so is M&H and Lands End. They all have met and passed the same tough standards even in random tests done by the APFA.
The M&H stuff is absolute crap unless your BMI is above 28. Then it "fits". Quality is still low end though. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2684906)
That was all a song and dance by the inept APFA. Their own testing concluded it met Oeko Tex 100 standards as does the M&H and Lands End. There was nothing "toxic" in those pieces outside industry norms and what you are feeling in the current uniform pieces.
As for the "reactions", that vast majority were due to the wool content which is why alternatives were made. Out of 80,000 employees some are bound to have some issues. People are allergic to all sorts of things, that doesn't make them "toxic". The TH-Alaska Airlines lawsuit was thrown out after being repeatedly debunked in all sorts of testing.
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2684999)
The reason we can't have nice things is because people refuse to look at facts and instead concoct this crazy conspiracy that TH is "poisoning" them. If TH is toxic so is M&H and Lands End. They all have met and passed the same tough standards even in random tests done by the APFA.
The M&H stuff is absolute crap unless your BMI is above 28. Then it "fits". Quality is still low end though. I wear plenty of wool things and have NEVER had a reaction like I had from TH. I'm not a flight attendant. I can vouch I had reactions. Can you explain, oh great one in the yoga pants, why I have respiratory issues when flying with someone wearing TH and that mysteriously go away when I'm away from them in my hotel room or at home? You like stretchy girl pants. I get it. You don't need to try so hard. Oh, and I love your bias against fat people. |
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2684920)
This is why we can’t have nice things. To everyone here that wears TH you’re a moron.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands