![]() |
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 2912167)
There's a plan for another parallel East of 18L, behind Wilson etc. Dunno the timeframe
Edit: It will help moving more aircraft but won’t help the poor ramp control who has put planes nose to nose. Not pretty. |
If they end up with anything like this, it would be an improvement. They're really going to need to find a way to move people across these long distances more quickly as these concourses expand. Even a bus system like PHL has would be better than nothing. I wouldn't expect to see any kind of train/people mover system.
At any rate, this is years and years down the road. So, the suck is going to be with us for a while yet. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f6/ce...2387dbe4e4.jpg |
Originally Posted by Erroneous
(Post 2912293)
If ATC can’t figure out how to de conflict all RJ arrivals/departures to the East runway now I don’t see how this will help be overly helpful.
Edit: It will help moving more aircraft but won’t help the poor ramp control who has put planes nose to nose. Not pretty. A lot of truth to that. They could make that ramp a lot less crowded with a better set of departures and arrivals. That said, fuel burns would probably go up a bit, so maybe our corporate overlords aren’t too interested. At the same time, our flight ops has us going everywhere at .79, so maybe IDGAF about fuel is in effect. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Earnings
Originally Posted by AZFlyer
(Post 2912304)
If they end up with anything like this, it would be an improvement. They're really going to need to find a way to move people across these long distances more quickly as these concourses expand. Even a bus system like PHL has would be better than nothing. I wouldn't expect to see any kind of train/people mover system.
At any rate, this is years and years down the road. So, the suck is going to be with us for a while yet. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f6/ce...2387dbe4e4.jpg Wow. Almost looks like the bastard love child of CLT, IAD, and ATL. Edit: Upon closer inspection, this seems to indicate they’d be getting rid of the entire current E Concourse, which I think is unlikely any time in the next 10-15 years based on all the money they’re spending on it. Source? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2912252)
That’s news to me. I’d settle for some lead-off lights for all the high speeds.
Some google-fu a while back found a 200+ page planning document from Mecklenburg County with all the details. I’ll see if I can find it...... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by TallFlyer
(Post 2912320)
Wow. Almost looks like the bastard love child of CLT, IAD, and ATL.
Edit: Upon closer inspection, this seems to indicate they’d be getting rid of the entire current E Concourse, which I think is unlikely any time in the next 10-15 years based on all the money they’re spending on it. Source? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I found that image via google while searching for the CLT airport master plan, which is here: http://www.charlotteairport.com/Abou...0-%20FINAL.pdf There are lots of different proposed expansions and developments for the airport shown in the master plan, with the one I posted above just being one of them. |
A lot of the ground congestion in CLT could be cleaned up by ATC not being stubborn and lazy. Especially during north operations.
|
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 2912387)
A lot of the ground congestion in CLT could be cleaned up by ATC not being stubborn and lazy. Especially during north operations.
Yep. Just blocked in to E30 after a 28 min taxi in from 36L. Part of that was spent sitting at 23S watching a dozen RJs go past headed to departures off of 36R and 36C Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by TallFlyer
(Post 2912412)
Yep. Just blocked in to E30 after a 28 min taxi in from 36L. Part of that was spent sitting at 23S watching a dozen RJs go past headed to departures off of 36R and 36C
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Three East/west main terminals with people movers up and down them and a bridge (in green) across them like DEN has. Or you could make an underground tram like ATL, PIT, DEN etc but that would be a lot more money for not that much time saved. Build the bridge first then work on the tunnel. This would allow flow to/from gates without being backed into an alley and both sides to get pushed as once with additional traffic taxing by. Also it would allow expansion if required of another additional terminal down the line. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2912470)
If there are serious about CLT not being a clustermuck they should design it like this.
Three East/west main terminals with people movers up and down them and a bridge (in green) across them like DEN has. Or you could make an underground tram like ATL, PIT, DEN etc but that would be a lot more money for not that much time saved. Build the bridge first then work on the tunnel. This would allow flow to/from gates without being backed into an alley and both sides to get pushed as once with additional traffic taxing by. Also it would allow expansion if required of another additional terminal down the line. A satellite terminal or two would be beneficial for sure. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands