New LOAs being offered...
Just heard...3 of them. Coming down the pipe any moment now. Standby...
|
Base blast I got from LAX had an attached LOA but said JetBlue on it. Did you just copy and paste their LOA and is that our actual LOA?
|
It's out. Check your emails...its from APA. I think this will really help us. 3 different tiers of Leaves of Absence being offered..including one paid at 55 hours.
The most interesting and unique one..is the Voluntary Permanent Leave of Absence. Basically an early retirement offer for pilots aged 62 to 64. |
This is great news. On a side note, I know Kirby and a few others have said that they are cutting their pay 100% and even other mansgments pay by 50%. Has Parker cut his pay at all?
|
If I was eligible I would have already said yes to the early out. That medical being included is huge.
|
Originally Posted by wiz5422
(Post 2999812)
This is great news. On a side note, I know Kirby and a few others have said that they are cutting their pay 100% and even other mansgments pay by 50%. Has Parker cut his pay at all?
But these LOAs just breathed a huge gust of life into this pilot group. The fact that there are 3 tiers including one for those pilots close to retirement is huge. My take is that many will jump on this..and in 3 to 6 months this whole corona situation will have settled down anyway. First good news in a couple of weeks. |
Originally Posted by wiz5422
(Post 2999812)
This is great news. On a side note, I know Kirby and a few others have said that they are cutting their pay 100% and even other mansgments pay by 50%. Has Parker cut his pay at all?
|
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 2999817)
Isn't he paid in stock?
|
Care to share.
|
So one is an Early Retirement LOA, one is a 55hr no fly line, what is the third LOA? Can you post them?
|
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 2999888)
So one is an Early Retirement LOA, one is a 55hr no fly line, what is the third LOA? Can you post them?
Pilots pay protected for COVID-19 quarantines for duration. Includes self-quarantines for sick family member. Sick bank restored for COVID-19 diagnosis. 1. Voluntary unpaid Leave of Absense, retain all benefits and accrue Length of Service, up to 12 months. 2. Voluntary Short-Term LoA, paid 55 credited hours, 1/3/6 months long, retain all benefits, 401k/profit sharing eligible, required to maintain currency but that’s it. 3. Voluntary Permanent LoA, age 62+ paid 50 hours until age 65, retain all benefits and 401k, etc as above, remaining sick deposited into HSA. Looks like a helluva job by APA and AA. |
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 2999888)
So one is an Early Retirement LOA, one is a 55hr no fly line, what is the third LOA? Can you post them?
|
Third one is an extended unpaid leave up to 1 year, with no requirement to stay current.
short term is either 1,3, or 6 months. Must maintain currency. Paid 55 hrs, with all bennies. permanent is 50 hrs till 65, all bennies, sick time goes to a HRA at a discounted rate. CANNOT come back to flying EVER. 62+ years old to apply |
Amazing when the company shows intention to negotiate!
Good job APA.LOA-20-001 has two primary provisions: Pay Protection for pilots impacted by COVID-19, and incentivized Voluntary Leaves of Absence. I encourage everyone to read the full text of the LOA, but here is a 30,000-foot view of the agreement. Pay Protection:
Three different voluntary Leaves of Absence will be offered. The special voluntary leaves are designed to reduce temporary pilot overages caused by current circumstances.
On a related note, I know the possibility of a furlough is on many of your minds. I can tell you that at this point, the likelihood of a furlough has not been suggested by either side. If that changes, we will let you know immediately. One of the main objectives of the LOA ratified today is to mitigate that threat. At this point, it is too early to tell if we are headed down that path, but understand that stopping and reversing the training machinery would be incredibly costly and time-consuming. It is in our mutual interest to avoid reductions by way of furlough. Furthermore, the airline industry is very different from what it was just before 9/11. Domestic load factors have increased from an average of 60% in 1990, to 69% in 2001, to 85% in 2019. International loads have risen from 67%, to 72%, to 84% over the same timeframe. The point is that the world travels by air far more than in the past, and the industry has become more efficient, so those loads are likely to return after the pandemic has passed (hopefully sooner rather than later). Additionally, furloughed pilots would require five or more weeks to requalify in their aircraft, greatly reducing the ability of American Airlines to resume normal service when the demand inevitably ramps back up. Know that while we finally have the basic protections necessary for a professional pilot to operate in a fast-evolving public health emergency, your union leadership will continue to operate “all hands on deck” until this crisis has passed, and we will continue updating you daily for as long as the situation remains critical. |
Am I missing something? Has the company agreed to this?
|
Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
(Post 2999933)
Am I missing something? Has the company agreed to this?
yes, and yes. |
Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
(Post 2999933)
Am I missing something? Has the company agreed to this?
|
Still no e-mail. Has this been sent out to the unwashed masses yet?
|
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 2999946)
Still no e-mail. Has this been sent out to the unwashed masses yet?
|
I think this is good news but worry about the costs the corporation takes on and how it will impact its future. I estimate this will cost about $2b to pay just the retirees assuming 4,000 take it over three years. This is a large cost that won't allow the company to adequately compete against the ULCC's whom I fear will gain a substantial foothold after this. Spirit is by far my largest worry.
I guess what I'm saying is, I worry AA will become what US Airways was...a slowly dying carrier not able to compete due to overburdened costs. I'm not trying to be negative but I think it's also important to take a bigger picture. |
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 2999950)
Late last night.
In all seriousness, this is good news. |
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 2999963)
Huh. Maybe I've already been furloughed! Should probably head back to the drinking thread on the United board. ;)
In all seriousness, this is good news. |
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 2999964)
Has UA announced furloughs?
|
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 2999967)
Sorry, it was a joke. I'm at AA. One of their guys started a 'what are you drinking' thread, and I was posting over there last week.
|
The COVID pay protection may as well be written in toilet paper. It's nearly impossible to get diagnosed with at this point.
|
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2999962)
I think this is good news but worry about the costs the corporation takes on and how it will impact its future. I estimate this will cost about $2b to pay just the retirees assuming 4,000 take it over three years. This is a large cost that won't allow the company to adequately compete against the ULCC's whom I fear will gain a substantial foothold after this. Spirit is by far my largest worry.
I guess what I'm saying is, I worry AA will become what US Airways was...a slowly dying carrier not able to compete due to overburdened costs. I'm not trying to be negative but I think it's also important to take a bigger picture. |
So for the 55 hr guys, is currency going to be maintained in the sim?
Yes, this is great work by everyone involved, but as mentioned above, what happens when they don't get enough takers. I know what I'd do if I were a 62 yo not sure if I wanted to go to 65, but what about everyone else banking on the next guy volunteering for the 55hr deal? |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2999962)
I think this is good news but worry about the costs the corporation takes on and how it will impact its future. I estimate this will cost about $2b to pay just the retirees assuming 4,000 take it over three years. This is a large cost that won't allow the company to adequately compete against the ULCC's whom I fear will gain a substantial foothold after this. Spirit is by far my largest worry.
I guess what I'm saying is, I worry AA will become what US Airways was...a slowly dying carrier not able to compete due to overburdened costs. I'm not trying to be negative but I think it's also important to take a bigger picture. |
Originally Posted by TankerDriver
(Post 2999994)
So for the 55 hr guys, is currency going to be maintained in the sim?
|
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2999997)
AA must genuinely think demand is going to come back, otherwise they'd just furlough outright.
My concern is the cost of this and what it will do for our ability to compete should we make it through. Anyone 62 and up should have their head examined if they don't take this. |
Originally Posted by TankerDriver
(Post 2999994)
So for the 55 hr guys, is currency going to be maintained in the sim?
Yes, this is great work by everyone involved, but as mentioned above, what happens when they don't get enough takers. I know what I'd do if I were a 62 yo not sure if I wanted to go to 65, but what about everyone else banking on the next guy volunteering for the 55hr deal? |
Originally Posted by 206321
(Post 2999989)
4000 is wayyy too high of an estimate. The company would never offer that many. I doubt they would even offer half that.
|
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 2999973)
The reason I asked I heard rumors that not enough pilots took the 50-hour-stay-at-home option.
|
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 3000000)
Numbers (cost) are like statistics. You can turn them around as much as you want, usually to management's advantage (bonus). Question here is what kind of deal the airlines can make with the government and banks.
|
Originally Posted by TankerDriver
(Post 2999994)
So for the 55 hr guys, is currency going to be maintained in the sim?
|
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 2999998)
I am wondering about this, too. Can you call scheduling/flight standards and pick up a trip to maintain currency?
|
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 2999998)
I am wondering about this, too. Can you call scheduling/flight standards and pick up a trip to maintain currency?
That being said, if that's the only "slip up" in this product, given the time pressure they were under, it still gets an A+ in my book. Very comprehensive, very well thought out. Definitely a well executed strike while the iron was hot. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2999962)
I think this is good news but worry about the costs the corporation takes on and how it will impact its future. I estimate this will cost about $2b to pay just the retirees assuming 4,000 take it over three years. This is a large cost that won't allow the company to adequately compete against the ULCC's whom I fear will gain a substantial foothold after this. Spirit is by far my largest worry.
I guess what I'm saying is, I worry AA will become what US Airways was...a slowly dying carrier not able to compete due to overburdened costs. I'm not trying to be negative but I think it's also important to take a bigger picture. |
Hopefully it is enough, but the year long LOA suggests that they already know that they'll end up with a group who'll need long term training when they come back. Obviously they want to pick some off the top of the list to minimize multiple layers of displacements. Still, it feels like only the first step in an overall reduction...
|
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 2999973)
The reason I asked I heard rumors that not enough pilots took the 50-hour-stay-at-home option.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:05 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands