![]() |
AAL Removed from S&P500
https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatsp...irlines-stock/
I am amazed that this management team is still running the ******* show here. It's a shame honestly. I have been here almost 3 years and the missteps are just continual. This management team does not know what a world class airline is and I truly believe they won't be able to get us back to being one. I think Isom and the domestic growth/ small international management visionaries need to be replaced with outsiders. I am truly curious if the board is as incompetent. On a side note, I will say that I do love my job and as long as my check clears I'm a pretty happy camper. It is the competetive spirit in me though that wants to strive to be the best in what I do and it be damned that I expect leadership should want the same. Whenever I bring this up on a trip with Captains who have been here many years, it's the same answer.. American always is third place and no one cares to change it. I realize I am ranting a bit but I am curious, what do you guys think the path forward looks like for us to be back in the competition with Delta and United? |
And why did you choose that title for the thread?
|
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3835270)
And why did you choose that title for the thread?
|
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 3835276)
Because that’s exactly what is happening? Did you read the article at all?
https://fortune.com/2024/09/06/palan...dex-reshuffle/ It's a market capitalization based index so that's how the cookie crumbles. Eventually we'll be dealing with some activist investors if they can't turn the stock around. |
Originally Posted by FLYMIA
(Post 3835260)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatsp...irlines-stock/
I am amazed that this management team is still running the ******* show here. It's a shame honestly. I have been here almost 3 years and the missteps are just continual. This management team does not know what a world class airline is and I truly believe they won't be able to get us back to being one. I think Isom and the domestic growth/ small international management visionaries need to be replaced with outsiders. I am truly curious if the board is as incompetent. On a side note, I will say that I do love my job and as long as my check clears I'm a pretty happy camper. It is the competetive spirit in me though that wants to strive to be the best in what I do and it be damned that I expect leadership should want the same. Whenever I bring this up on a trip with Captains who have been here many years, it's the same answer.. American always is third place and no one cares to change it. I realize I am ranting a bit but I am curious, what do you guys think the path forward looks like for us to be back in the competition with Delta and United? Serious question, why do you care about stock price? Seems like an odd thing to shake your fist at. |
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 3835276)
Because that’s exactly what is happening? Did you read the article at all?
Read the article...admittedly have not been following AAL and the S&P .....but didnt get that info from this article. |
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3835302)
Read the article...admittedly have not been following AAL and the S&P .....but didnt get that info from this article.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3835283)
Serious question, why do you care about stock price? Seems like an odd thing to shake your fist at.
and then of course the wildcard PE Firm buying it up and that’s a crap shoot. Why care about the owners of the company? |
So we still getting paid this month? This is a management and Wall St problem not a pilot problem. Just fly the airplane and worry about the things you can control.
|
Originally Posted by 170Till5
(Post 3835306)
if a stock price goes to $0, yeah, why worry? Why are people talking about bankruptcy so much with Spirit and JetBlue? Go look at their stock price..
and then of course the wildcard PE Firm buying it up and that’s a crap shoot. Why care about the owners of the company? |
Deactivated from the S&P 500 after joining on March 16, 2015. Activated to the S&P MidCap 400.
Tbh all airline stocks are junk, terrible investments. DAL down 30%, UAL down 50%, AAL down 60% on 5y chart. Idc about the stock. I care about management paying off debts efficiently so we have the capital to purchase new shiny things. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3835307)
So we still getting paid this month? This is a management and Wall St problem not a pilot problem. Just fly the airplane and worry about the things you can control.
Getting kicked from the S&P isn't the end of the world but it's not great. Many Americans invest in the S&P and it helps keep your stock price up just because everyone is buying it blindly. United will surpass our fleet size sometime over the next year or two if their deliveries continue. Delta makes massively more profit than we do. The question should be asked, what does a 2030, 2040, 2050 AA look like? Is there room for three legacy network carriers in the US? SWA does domestic better/cheaper than us, and DL and UA do international better than us. We just sort of exist right now. Kinda like UA in 2010-2016. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3835327)
United will surpass our fleet size sometime over the next year or two if their deliveries continue. They already have. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3835327)
I agree, (for now) the issue becomes if we get so cheap someone buys us for our parts.
|
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3835307)
So we still getting paid this month? This is a management and Wall St problem not a pilot problem. Just fly the airplane and worry about the things you can control.
The article I posted wasn't the best, heres another one. Though I'm not much of a fan from these guys. https://viewfromthewing.com/american...out-of-sp-500/ |
Originally Posted by RippinClapBombs
(Post 3835315)
Deactivated from the S&P 500 after joining on March 16, 2015. Activated to the S&P MidCap 400.
Tbh all airline stocks are junk, terrible investments. DAL down 30%, UAL down 50%, AAL down 60% on 5y chart. Idc about the stock. I care about management paying off debts efficiently so we have the capital to purchase new shiny things. |
Originally Posted by FLYMIA
(Post 3835342)
I'm not saying we aren't getting paid or that AA is on the verge of shutting down doom and gloom. Of course these issues bother me as they should you. You have a vested interest in our future here and should care about the course that is plotted. Obviously we don't have control over these things but I'm not going to stop talking about said issues.
The article I posted wasn't the best, heres another one. Though I'm not much of a fan from these guys. https://viewfromthewing.com/american...out-of-sp-500/ |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3835327)
I agree, (for now) the issue becomes if we get so cheap someone buys us for our parts. That was a real concern back when Doug was running things for a brief period as well.
Getting kicked from the S&P isn't the end of the world but it's not great. Many Americans invest in the S&P and it helps keep your stock price up just because everyone is buying it blindly. United will surpass our fleet size sometime over the next year or two if their deliveries continue. Delta makes massively more profit than we do. The question should be asked, what does a 2030, 2040, 2050 AA look like? Is there room for three legacy network carriers in the US? SWA does domestic better/cheaper than us, and DL and UA do international better than us. We just sort of exist right now. Kinda like UA in 2010-2016. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3835359)
No one is going to buy this much debt.
AA will do what's it's always done. Plod along and be mediocre and keep their head just above the water. We all knew it when we came here. As long as the paychecks keep clearing I'll keep doing my job and enjoying my days off. Management makes the big bucks to worry about Wall St. not us. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3835327)
The question should be asked, what does a 2030, 2040, 2050 AA look like? Is there room for three legacy network carriers in the US?
SWA does domestic better/cheaper than us, and DL and UA do international better than us. We just sort of exist right now. Kinda like UA in 2010-2016. |
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places it struggles in. Jfk, lax and ord are money losing pits that do nothing but cannibalize resources that could be used for the more profitable hubs. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places is struggles. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. JetBlue literally just started their plan and they just took out almost three billion in loans at ridiculously high rates. The jury is going to be out for a long time as to whether they are righting the ship. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax.
No way this isn’t a troll post. |
Originally Posted by Montcalm
(Post 3835384)
No way this isn’t a troll post.
AA is failing in all three of those cities and other hubs are being harmed as a result of the vein attempt to make those replaces work. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places it struggles in. Jfk, lax and ord are money losing pits that do nothing but cannibalize resources that could be used for the more profitable hubs. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places it struggles in. Jfk, lax and ord are money losing pits that do nothing but cannibalize resources that could be used for the more profitable hubs. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. Dehubbing JFK, ORD and LAX is asinine. All we would be doing is giving up the few remaining high value customers we have to United and Delta. It's not all about Joe Sixpack in Philly who wants to fly to FLL a few times a year. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3835391)
JB is on the verge of following Spirit down the toilet. Just took out a high internet $3B loan to keep the place afloat. They're burning the furniture now. Not a good example of what to do.
Dehubbing JFK, ORD and LAX is asinine. All we would be doing is giving up the few remaining high value customers we have to United and Delta. It's not all about Joe Sixpack in Philly who wants to fly to FLL a few times a year. AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835401)
They are cutting the unprofitable and sticking with what makes them money.
AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835401)
They are cutting the unprofitable and sticking with what makes them money.
AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3835359)
No one is going to buy this much debt.
Originally Posted by CRJCapitan
(Post 3835364)
I think you just answered your own question. All three of these carriers are cyclical and it'll ebb and flow as to who is mediocre and who is really doing well.
|
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835401)
They are cutting the unprofitable and sticking with what makes them money.
AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3835355)
Still beats the hell out of where we came from my friend. Everything cycles in this industry. AA is still paying down debt. This isn't the time to climb out on the ledge just because UA is overextending themselves and DL is making money hand over fist as usual while they screw their employees and customers over. AA isn't going out of business. "Too big to fail". If anything Uncle Sugar will get involved again. Stocks mean nothing unless you're a hedge fund.
|
Originally Posted by GrayFlyer
(Post 3835442)
You're under-informed then. B6's intra-westcoast routes made money. Management thinks they can make more money in the immediate future by sending those planes to the Caribbean in exchange for gutting their west coast structure. B6 has an activist investor whose primary strategy is to invest in companies he believes in, but which he thinks are stymied by dysfunctional C-suites. Watch an interview of him and he says it very clearly, his aim is always to fix and/or replace upper-level management and then watch for positive results to trickle down into the company, thereby turning the whole place around. The goal of B6's current management is to make the next quarter green at all costs, long-term strategy be damned. They are trying to keep their jobs. Yes, their actions will probably help right the ship, but it comes with a high cost of not only continuing to underserve fly-over USA, but now extending that lack-luster strategy to the west coast. Ask your nearest west coast friend if they've ever flown on JetBlue. Drive around the large west coast cities and see if you spot any JetBlue advertising. It's not a thing. Do you honestly think B6's west coast customers want to connect through JFK/BOS to get to their new EU destinations? Or, conversely, would their east coast customers want to connect through LAX to reach their long-promised destinations in Hawaii? No, hell no. If you were thinking long-term, you'd be taking different actions. This is a short-term strategy and everyone knows it. All airlines struggle in LAX because nobody dominates it, not to mention all of the ancillary airports in Socal. There's 24 million people in Socal, plus another 3.5 million in Northern Baja (who, yes, use LAX because TIJ/SAN/SNA/ONT don't offer the same type of long-haul service). If you want to work for an airline that doesn't care to cater to such a large potential customer base, by all means, apply to B6, but don't think for a second that any legacy carrier is short-sighted enough to consider your suggestion.
|
JetBlue cut their west coast flights way back
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3835314)
We aren’t anywhere close to bankruptcy or the stock going to zero. If you want to talk about management doing a **** poor job, have at it, but sulking about the stock price is odd.
|
United would LOVE if AA pulled out of JFK.
|
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835401)
They are cutting the unprofitable and sticking with what makes them money.
AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3835519)
Stock price has a lot to do with the future of a company. It to extent determines the cost to borrow capital, procure assets and influence political aspects. By far however the most important thing is keeping corporate raiders out of the balance sheet and cash flow. Corporate raider is a old term that is now called private equity. Sounds much better. Private equity comes in like a giant cash sucking vacuum. They suck up the cash for their investors and bolt for the next victim to bleed dry.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3835552)
Have you seen the AA balance sheet? There’s nothing to raid.
|
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3835531)
Your strategy sucks and is already losing 'caus' that's what we are doing now. Shrink DFW and CLT, we already stuff too much through there. Any cost savings we get from over utilizing those airports are lost during our extreme and numerous industry leading IROPS at those two locations. We are permanently losing customers because if this misguided strategy. Move CLT slots to ORD and DFW slots to PHX. Grow ORD back up to 1000 plus pilots. You diversify flying to combat IROPs with ORD and you take advantage of the year-round great weather of PHX. Win win win.
MAGA Make American Great Again |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands