![]() |
FAA stepping in to ORD fight
Looks like AA is finally getting the win it needs in ORD. The FAA seems like it's about to slap Kirby down with his petty games in ord. I doubt the brain trust in SkyView has anything to do with this. I would like to think they were this Smart but past experiences show that not to be the case. Either way the FAA might actually be doing their job right for once.
The kirby ballwashers over In the united cult board are already trying to spin this but it's pretty clear to anyone not in the kirby kult that this will end badly for them. |
Originally Posted by SkyGodKing
(Post 4007614)
Looks like AA is finally getting the win it needs in ORD. The FAA seems like it's about to slap Kirby down with his petty games in ord. I doubt the brain trust in SkyView has anything to do with this. I would like to think they were this Smart but past experiences show that not to be the case. Either way the FAA might actually be doing their job right for once.
The kirby ballwashers over In the united cult board are already trying to spin this but it's pretty clear to anyone not in the kirby kult that this will end badly for them. I'm not pro-UA, just saying this may not be such an open and shut case. Either way the way they planned this out years in advance is pretty impressive, I don't think we've ever done anything that took years to play out lol. |
Originally Posted by SkyGodKing
(Post 4007614)
Looks like AA is finally getting the win it needs in ORD. The FAA seems like it's about to slap Kirby down with his petty games in ord. I doubt the brain trust in SkyView has anything to do with this. I would like to think they were this Smart but past experiences show that not to be the case. Either way the FAA might actually be doing their job right for once.
The kirby ballwashers over In the united cult board are already trying to spin this but it's pretty clear to anyone not in the kirby kult that this will end badly for them. |
If all carriers are required to reduce their flights by a certain percentage, then it is fair. Otherwise, its not.
|
Originally Posted by SkyGodKing
(Post 4007614)
Looks like AA is finally getting the win it needs in ORD. The FAA seems like it's about to slap Kirby down with his petty games in ord. I doubt the brain trust in SkyView has anything to do with this. I would like to think they were this Smart but past experiences show that not to be the case. Either way the FAA might actually be doing their job right for once.
The kirby ballwashers over In the united cult board are already trying to spin this but it's pretty clear to anyone not in the kirby kult that this will end badly for them. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 4007703)
I don’t know why you are celebrating….AA mainline barely flies out of Chicago.
|
Originally Posted by SkyGodKing
(Post 4007614)
Looks like AA is finally getting the win it needs in ORD. The FAA seems like it's about to slap Kirby down with his petty games in ord. I doubt the brain trust in SkyView has anything to do with this. I would like to think they were this Smart but past experiences show that not to be the case. Either way the FAA might actually be doing their job right for once.
The kirby ballwashers over In the united cult board are already trying to spin this but it's pretty clear to anyone not in the kirby kult that this will end badly for them. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 4007703)
I don’t know why you are celebrating….AA mainline barely flies out of Chicago.
|
Originally Posted by CRJCapitan
(Post 4007784)
Good to know the United guys have a better grasp on our our hub than we do...
|
Originally Posted by sn00p
(Post 4007711)
Talk about gaslighting 😂
|
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...struction/amp/
“The airline estimated that it will cut a maximum of 40 arrivals and departures from previous estimates, while United will be required to shave off more than 200 flights for peak summer travel days.” |
Originally Posted by sn00p
(Post 4024571)
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...struction/amp/
“The airline estimated that it will cut a maximum of 40 arrivals and departures from previous estimates, while United will be required to shave off more than 200 flights for peak summer travel days.” |
Originally Posted by CRJCapitan
(Post 4024580)
Probably the best result possible for AA.
|
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4024640)
As it should be considering it wasn't AA trying to start this mess, it was Kirby's attempt to "de-hub"
|
Originally Posted by SkyGodKing
(Post 4007614)
Looks like AA is finally getting the win it needs in ORD. The FAA seems like it's about to slap Kirby down with his petty games in ord. I doubt the brain trust in SkyView has anything to do with this. I would like to think they were this Smart but past experiences show that not to be the case. Either way the FAA might actually be doing their job right for once.
The kirby ballwashers over In the united cult board are already trying to spin this but it's pretty clear to anyone not in the kirby kult that this will end badly for them. Kirby told the company in a townhall that he would’ve rather not have gotten into ****ing match in ORD, but AA shoved a bunch of flights into Chicago so he was forced to respond (paraphrasing, of course). We’ll see how this plays out for our respective carriers |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4024710)
I get the banter between difference pilot groups, but objectively speaking, it’s not “petty games.” If gate allocation is based off utilization and your competitor dumps a bunch of flights into ORD, the normal response is to dump a bunch of flights too.
Kirby told the company in a townhall that he would’ve rather not have gotten into ****ing match in ORD, but AA shoved a bunch of flights into Chicago so he was forced to respond (paraphrasing, of course). We’ll see how this plays out for our respective carriers |
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4024712)
And the reason AA did that was due to a backroom deal Kirby made with Chicago to steal some gates away that went against the post-COVID agreement the airlines had with Chicago. I know the lawsuit got thrown out but it wasn't because American's claim was wrong, it was more due to technicalities. Then the infamous "de-hubbing" slide presentation got leaked and all but forced AA's hand. So yes, it all started with UA and Kirby's ego.
I don’t recall the specific slide you mentioned, but our quarterly townhalls with the E-Team have slides with financial and operational numbers showing how United did compared to the rest of the industry. Doubt it was some sort of slide that was made specifically with the intention to force AA to do anything. If the slide was from the townhall, it’s public. If it was leaked from a management meeting then it was never meant for anyone (including AA) to see. Regardless, only AA decides how to react. The reality is, Kirby can’t make anyone do anything they don’t want to. If AA management decided to react the way they did, that falls on them. Bobby Ice runs AA, not Kirby. That said, idk Chicago politics. UA is the headquartered in Chicago so it would make sense for United to be favored. If UA started a war in DFW, the local politicians would probably side with AA. Same with ATL and Delta. Just the way it is |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4024755)
So a slide with metrics and performance numbers showing UA winning ORD that would eventually force AA to de-hub is forcing AA’s hand?
I don’t recall the specific slide you mentioned, but our quarterly townhalls with the E-Team have slides with financial and operational numbers showing how United did compared to the rest of the industry. Doubt it was some sort of slide that was made specifically with the intention to force AA to do anything. If the slide was from the townhall, it’s public. If it was leaked from a management meeting then it was never meant for anyone (including AA) to see. Regardless, only AA decides how to react. The reality is, Kirby can’t make anyone do anything they don’t want to. If AA management decided to react the way they did, that falls on them. Bobby Ice runs AA, not Kirby. That said, idk Chicago politics. UA is the headquartered in Chicago so it would make sense for United to be favored. If UA started a war in DFW, the local politicians would probably side with AA. Same with ATL and Delta. Just the way it is |
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4024756)
So what you are saying is you basically do not know the history at all of how this all started. Why are you in this thread and what exactly as a devote Kirbylite what are you defending? That United shouldn't have taken the lion share of cuts? Why?
I didn’t look into the details of the flight cuts so I won’t comment on that. Whatever comes of it, management will manage and I’ll fly the metal. Some of you guys get wrapped all around the axel about Kirby. Anyone that goes against whatever narrative is popular at AA for the day is a “Kirbylite”. It’s just strange. All this is business, not personal. As pilots, we’re all on the same side. Yet, some of yall make bashing UA, Kirby and UA pilots a personality trait. Relax, gents. It’s not that serious |
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4024712)
And the reason AA did that was due to a backroom deal Kirby made with Chicago to steal some gates away that went against the post-COVID agreement the airlines had with Chicago. I know the lawsuit got thrown out but it wasn't because American's claim was wrong, it was more due to technicalities. Then the infamous "de-hubbing" slide presentation got leaked and all but forced AA's hand. So yes, it all started with UA and Kirby's ego.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4024785)
I’m saying that some “leaked” slide of AA de-hubing ORD did not make Isom grow ORD by hundreds of flights. I’m also saying that it wasn’t “petty” that UA responded to AA by also adding flights.
I didn’t look into the details of the flight cuts so I won’t comment on that. Whatever comes of it, management will manage and I’ll fly the metal. Some of you guys get wrapped all around the axel about Kirby. Anyone that goes against whatever narrative is popular at AA for the day is a “Kirbylite”. It’s just strange. All this is business, not personal. As pilots, we’re all on the same side. Yet, some of yall make bashing UA, Kirby and UA pilots a personality trait. Relax, gents. It’s not that serious |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 4007703)
I don’t know why you are celebrating….AA mainline barely flies out of Chicago.
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4024785)
I’m saying that some “leaked” slide of AA de-hubing ORD did not make Isom grow ORD by hundreds of flights. I’m also saying that it wasn’t “petty” that UA responded to AA by also adding flights.
I didn’t look into the details of the flight cuts so I won’t comment on that. Whatever comes of it, management will manage and I’ll fly the metal. Some of you guys get wrapped all around the axel about Kirby. Anyone that goes against whatever narrative is popular at AA for the day is a “Kirbylite”. It’s just strange. All this is business, not personal. As pilots, we’re all on the same side. Yet, some of yall make bashing UA, Kirby and UA pilots a personality trait. Relax, gents. It’s not that serious Anyone who takes anything personally on this site definitely needs to touch grass. However, the idiom don’t dish it out if you can’t take it comes to mind. Kirby has played a loud and boastful tune that some take to heart, including bashing other airlines openly. I’m also glad AA management is not boasting about this win, because I know UAL management would be cringe and bashful had the outcome turned out differently. |
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4024802)
Who is taking this personal? Kirby started this by trying to dehub American by stealing their gates with his backroom deal with the city of Chicago. 100% on your golden boy here. He wanted to dehub AA and it was United is the Who added flIghts first, forcing AA to respond in kind. You're just looking one step back when this started several steps.ago. invite you to do some research.
I also get what you’re saying about UA adding flights first. However, the UnitedNext plan was to grow in all of the hubs. ORD is unique that 2 carriers call it a hub and how the airport allocates the gates (this pre-dates the turf war). UA was always going to grow ORD which would’ve forced AA to respond. Again, it wasn’t out of pettiness, it was planned from the inception of UnitedNext. Should a company not grow and expand because another company would hate it? |
Originally Posted by sn00p
(Post 4024804)
The above quote is just one instance of a UA pilot bashing AA in this very thread for no reason.
Anyone who takes anything personally on this site definitely needs to touch grass. However, the idiom don’t dish it out if you can’t take it comes to mind. Kirby has played a loud and boastful tune that some take to heart, including bashing other airlines openly. I’m also glad AA management is not boasting about this win, because I know UAL management would be cringe and bashful had the outcome turned out differently. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4024828)
Yeah, I won’t speak for anyone. I don’t get why some people do that. Kirby is boastful. He admitted to it as well and followed up with other CEOs are too, he just does it publicly.
Now it looks like AA will be getting some gates back next year. Funny how things work out sometimes. |
Originally Posted by CRJCapitan
(Post 4024836)
The ironic thing is it almost definitely led to a worse outcome for United in Chicago. I'm not even sure the gate allocation strategy was even on AA's radar until UA management started bragging about all the gates it was getting, all the flights it was adding and that AA would eventually be force to de hub ORD. If AA wasn't paying attention before, it definitely was after.
Now it looks like AA will be getting some gates back next year. Funny how things work out sometimes. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4024895)
I don’t totally disagree with you, but I will add that AA had to have known about the losing gates with or without the boastfulness of SK
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4024895)
I don’t totally disagree with you, but I will add that AA had to have known about the losing gates with or without the boastfulness of SK
|
It’s my belief Kirby and his wife got their cheeks done by the same plastic surgeon.
|
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4024802)
Who is taking this personal? Kirby started this by trying to dehub American by stealing their gates with his backroom deal with the city of Chicago. 100% on your golden boy here. He wanted to dehub AA and it was United is the Who added flIghts first, forcing AA to respond in kind. You're just looking one step back when this started several steps.ago. invite you to do some research.
|
Originally Posted by ps2sunvalley
(Post 4025710)
Tell me more about the backroom deal.
|
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4025800)
See previous posts.
What most likely happened is that UA saw the gate allocation method and decided to make a play to gain more gates/market share in ORD. |
Originally Posted by ps2sunvalley
(Post 4025847)
It's just wild conspiracy type thinking that SK drew up a backroom deal with the city. I'm no SK fan but come on, that didn't happen.
What most likely happened is that UA saw the gate allocation method and decided to make a play to gain more gates/market share in ORD. |
In a meeting to determine flight cuts at ORD for the Summer season, United’s head of network planning Patrick Quayle said, “I think we can all agree Robert Isom is not Robert Crandall”.
https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net...jw&oe=69ED8B63 |
Originally Posted by Tayo826
(Post 4025922)
In a meeting to determine flight cuts at ORD for the Summer season, United’s head of network planning Patrick Quayle said, “I think we can all agree Robert Isom is not Robert Crandall”.
https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net...jw&oe=69ED8B63 |
Originally Posted by ps2sunvalley
(Post 4025847)
It's just wild conspiracy type thinking that SK drew up a backroom deal with the city. I'm no SK fan but come on, that didn't happen.
What most likely happened is that UA saw the gate allocation method and decided to make a play to gain more gates/market share in ORD. For whatever reason, AA thought that the gate reallocation process would be placed on hold during terminal construction. They claim they believed that so strongly that it's why they sued. Obviously the judge thought differently. Whether they believed all that because they're incompetent or they were lied to? I doubt anyone on APC knows. My personal unfounded conspiracy theory is the Chicago Department of Aviation did what it did to sell more Jet A at the widly inflated prices they charge. If you've been there in the last year, you know. Ironically, it probably mattered little between the FAA order and the new results of the reallocation process: https://www.chicagobusiness.com/tran...ited-american/ Looks like AA will get back 3 of the 4 gates they lost so now G will mostly be AA RJs again. Maybe they can take the carpet off the American Eagle logo. |
“I want to talk about -- talk about proportionality and choices people are making. Our strategy was to grow all of our hubs and invest across the board. American chose differently. And if you -- American, if you look, chose to grow Austin; they chose to grow Charlotte, Miami, Dallas; they chose not -- they chose not to grow Chicago.” - PQ
Basically what I said before I saw the transcripts. Nothing petty, just intentional planning and execution of UnitedNext. |
Originally Posted by LearPilot88
(Post 4026070)
Nothing says class like personal attacks on your rivals CEO.
It seems as if even the analysts have stopped asking the hard questions during earnings calls. They just lob up some softballs for Isom and team. The industry has evolved from the big three to the big two and everyone else. Let’s see how we do tomorrow. UAL increased revenue by 10%+ and booked net income of $700 million. Many thought they were growing too fast and in an era of global uncertainty they would lose money hand over fist. Here we are in a war time environment with a fuel crisis and they are still printing money. Maybe an army of high CASM RJs flying to low $ markets and farming out a large chunk of our international network to JV partners wasn’t the winning formula. |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 4026358)
I don’t know if that’s a personal attack? He wasn’t criticizing his looks or personality. He was correctly pointing out that AA has been an operational and strategic disaster ever since Isom took the helm. I would be hard pressed to come up with even one significant win during his tenure. Almost every strategic move has been a failure.
It seems as if even the analysts have stopped asking the hard questions during earnings calls. They just lob up some softballs for Isom and team. The industry has evolved from the big three to the big two and everyone else. Let’s see how we do tomorrow. UAL increased revenue by 10%+ and booked net income of $700 million. Many thought they were growing too fast and in an era of global uncertainty they would lose money hand over fist. Here we are in a war time environment with a fuel crisis and they are still printing money. Maybe an army of high CASM RJs flying to low $ markets and farming out a large chunk of our international network to JV partners wasn’t the winning formula. |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 4026358)
I don’t know if that’s a personal attack? He wasn’t criticizing his looks or personality. He was correctly pointing out that AA has been an operational and strategic disaster ever since Isom took the helm. I would be hard pressed to come up with even one significant win during his tenure. Almost every strategic move has been a failure.
It seems as if even the analysts have stopped asking the hard questions during earnings calls. They just lob up some softballs for Isom and team. The industry has evolved from the big three to the big two and everyone else. Let’s see how we do tomorrow. UAL increased revenue by 10%+ and booked net income of $700 million. Many thought they were growing too fast and in an era of global uncertainty they would lose money hand over fist. Here we are in a war time environment with a fuel crisis and they are still printing money. Maybe an army of high CASM RJs flying to low $ markets and farming out a large chunk of our international network to JV partners wasn’t the winning formula. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands