![]() |
No problem Tomahawk, with liking your company....I would say you're a bit extreme, though....You're proud to drink the AA cool-aid but remember, by definition "to drink cool-aid" means to be unrealistic or slavish...unthinking in loyalty to a certain "brand"...But "brand" in this case is a group of management individuals who think it is appropriate to try to take away from you (pilots) as much as they can possibly get away with in bancruptcy...-that is their "job"....it is a simple equation, -in their view, the less you (pilots) make in compensation and benefits the better it is for that entity you profess to love so much..."American Airlines". -Your "job"is to fly and try to preserve your profession and lifestyle, -not agree whole-heartedly with those whose purpose in bancruptcy is to gut your profession...
The "cool-aid" term originates, of course, with the mass suicide of the Rev. Jim Jones group in Guyana back in 1978. It implies a brainwashed, syncophantic group who are unhealthily compliant...worshipful, with whatever their leadership wants. At least take a balanced view...It appears the vast majority of your fellow pilots disagree with your stance on this issue....that should tell you something...Either you are an insightful, prescient genius of airline economics and are acting on that unbiased knowledge....or...you disregard the very questionable necessity of destroying the benefits of your chosen career to the maximal extent possible, just because "somebody says so"...and that "somebody" happens to have "American Airlines" associated with his name. You give all the impressions that the latter, and not the former is true, Tomahawk. -Any extreme view or favoritism on any side is not only unhealthy, but is likely unrealistic and untrue. Prior to Parker's offer, I would have been one of those saying that the AA pilots would never in a hundred years agree to merge with US/AW...with that whole labor/SLI mess. But how can it be that labor peace and an actual increase in pay/benefits could be considered viable in bancruptcy? At the very, very least, Tomahawk, it should tell you Horton is going after way more than is necessary.... not because he "loves" American Airlines...-but, simply because he "can". |
Originally Posted by wiggy
(Post 1187940)
No problem Tomahawk, with liking your company....I would say you're a bit extreme, though....You're proud to drink the AA cool-aid but remember, by definition "to drink cool-aid" means to be unrealistic or slavish...unthinking in loyalty to a certain "brand"...But "brand" in this case is a group of management individuals who think it is appropriate to try to take away from you (pilots) as much as they can possibly get away with in bancruptcy...-that is their "job"....it is a simple equation, -in their view, the less you (pilots) make in compensation and benefits the better it is for that entity you profess to love so much..."American Airlines". -Your "job"is to fly and try to preserve your profession and lifestyle, -not agree whole-heartedly with those whose purpose in bancruptcy is to gut your profession...
The "cool-aid" term originates, of course, with the mass suicide of the Rev. Jim Jones group in Guyana back in 1978. It implies a brainwashed, syncophantic group who are unhealthily compliant...worshipful, with whatever their leadership wants. At least take a balanced view...It appears the vast majority of your fellow pilots disagree with your stance on this issue....that should tell you something...Either you are an insightful, prescient genius of airline economics and are acting on that unbiased knowledge....or...you disregard the very questionable necessity of destroying the benefits of your chosen career to the maximal extent possible, just because "somebody says so"...and that "somebody" happens to have "American Airlines" associated with his name. You give all the impressions that the latter, and not the former is true, Tomahawk. -Any extreme view or favoritism on any side is not only unhealthy, but is likely unrealistic and untrue. Prior to Parker's offer, I would have been one of those saying that the AA pilots would never in a hundred years agree to merge with US/AW...with that whole labor/SLI mess. But how can it be that labor peace and an actual increase in pay/benefits could be considered viable in bancruptcy? At the very, very least, Tomahawk, it should tell you Horton is going after way more than is necessary.... not because he "loves" American Airlines...-but, simply because he "can". |
Yes, a history lesson that should make anyone who is "proud to drink cool-aid" -pause to think...perhaps better choices are made by using the faculty of "reason" rather than "blind faith".
|
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 1187493)
You don't appear to be interested in what's best for AA, you appear to want Horton to stay in power.
I'd love to hear why you think Horton's plan of not merging until later is better than merging now? Who gains from that? Does that really make AA stronger ASAP? Thankfully, they're a VERY small minority in this profession. |
Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
(Post 1187700)
...........Loyalty, duty and honor are NOT traits of convenience.
|
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 1187817)
T58 -
Horton's plan - 1420 less pilots by 2014(court testimony) Parker's plan - keep all the pilots. What "strong vision" are you thinking of? Can't trust anything from this source anymore as it changes day-by-day on a whim. No "loyalty, duty and honor" built with that. |
Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
(Post 1187962)
Thanks for the history lesson
|
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 1187817)
T58 -
Horton's plan - 1420 less pilots by 2014(court testimony) Parker's plan - keep all the pilots. What "strong vision" are you thinking of? |
Originally Posted by lolwut
(Post 1188224)
Parker's plan - keep all the pilots, or keep all the AA pilots? Been pretty quiet as to if the US pilot jobs are secure in this transaction or not. I could see PHL, PHX, and CLT all facing cuts for various reasons if the merger happens. Are these jobs safe or not?
Don't be lured in by the grotesquely biased source here determined to upset the apple cart with disinformation. |
Originally Posted by lolwut
(Post 1188224)
Parker's plan - keep all the pilots, or keep all the AA pilots? Been pretty quiet as to if the US pilot jobs are secure in this transaction or not. I could see PHL, PHX, and CLT all facing cuts for various reasons if the merger happens. Are these jobs safe or not?
It is very difficult to get hired by Airways right now. You have to be lucky(which there have been some), have connections or have an outstanding resume. In a few years it'll be another story. |
Originally Posted by wiggy
(Post 1187940)
No problem Tomahawk, with liking your company....I would say you're a bit extreme, though....You're proud to drink the AA cool-aid but remember, by definition "to drink cool-aid" means to be unrealistic or slavish...unthinking in loyalty to a certain "brand"...But "brand" in this case is a group of management individuals who think it is appropriate to try to take away from you (pilots) as much as they can possibly get away with in bancruptcy...-that is their "job"....
Great post wiggy! Wish I could have said it this well. |
To Biggie from wiggy: thanks biggie!
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands