Quote:
Originally Posted by eaglefly
I'm sorry, I understood that to be part of their Constituition. Come to think of it, what were their demands in the AWA merger ?
If I'm incorrect, feel free to correct me with facts.
You made a statement about someone else's union position in a future arbitration that may never even occur... that you implicitly assumed was true.. ...you used no facts... and now you want us to prove your assumption was wrong?
Why would we waste our time on your factless, implicit assumptions about things that may never even happen?
You would fit in great with the West pilots (implicit assumption kings).
P.S. The one fact you tried to allude to was irrelevant. ALPA, not USAPA, was the union Constitution in effect in the last arbitration, and even ALAP's constitution has changed since then, which is also irrelevant.