Petition to mods: Ban Cactiboss and WD
#22
I guess it all depends on how you view internet forums. I see them as a place to attempt to have a meaningful exchange of ideas and information. People like CB and WD, (and from what I can see- you), see them as a place to vent their anger and frustration under a veil of anonymity, or in some cases, just be a dick.
For the most part, I think the mods do a decent job of keeping things civil on here, but it seems like CB and WD get away with a lot, so I called for the ban. I guess you like the tone they set.
Seriously.
#23
I disagree. I think these two should stick around. While they don't use the best method of conveying their message, I usually understand where they are coming from. It's always seems easy for an East guy to say "move on" about the Nic. The truth is the truth and just because it's been seven years doesn't mean people can just forget something this big.
#24
Anymore I just feel pity for them. I won't advocate for a ban, but it would probably benefit them the most. Time to warm up the ignore list.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
The biggest issue is that they won't let go of the past. US and AA are in a new merger now and they can't let go of the US/AA saga that goes back to 2005.
Thread after thread gets ruined by their banter. Most people on here are trying to have adult, informational discussion about the AA/US merger, not the Nic fight that is essentially dead.
Instead of letting bygones be bygones they just keep instilling divisiveness by name calling and bashing of their coworkers.
Thread after thread gets ruined by their banter. Most people on here are trying to have adult, informational discussion about the AA/US merger, not the Nic fight that is essentially dead.
Instead of letting bygones be bygones they just keep instilling divisiveness by name calling and bashing of their coworkers.
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 62
Just curious who you fly for? As far as the NIC being dead, no matter how bad the east wishes it were, it's not. While these 2 seem passionate on their position, how are they any different then some of the prolific easties?
curioUOTE=nwa757;1601924]The biggest issue is that they won't let go of the past. US and AA are in a new merger now and they can't let go of the US/AA saga that goes back to 2005.
Thread after thread gets ruined by their banter. Most people on here are trying to have adult, informational discussion about the AA/US merger, not the Nic fight that is essentially dead.
Instead of letting bygones be bygones they just keep instilling divisiveness by name calling and bashing of their coworkers.[/QUOTE]
curioUOTE=nwa757;1601924]The biggest issue is that they won't let go of the past. US and AA are in a new merger now and they can't let go of the US/AA saga that goes back to 2005.
Thread after thread gets ruined by their banter. Most people on here are trying to have adult, informational discussion about the AA/US merger, not the Nic fight that is essentially dead.
Instead of letting bygones be bygones they just keep instilling divisiveness by name calling and bashing of their coworkers.[/QUOTE]
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Sierra Hotel ... S.H. ... $h!t h0t
W.D. ..... Think about it.
When he figures it out he will leave on his own, or stay and provide us the continued blue pill humor.
W.D. ..... Think about it.
When he figures it out he will leave on his own, or stay and provide us the continued blue pill humor.
#29
It would be mistake to ban these guys.
I also lurk and occasionally post but find so much of this stuff mind numbing.
If posters were inhibited from expressing their passion this would turn into a real bore. Not sayings other people don't have rights or shouldn't be upset. I'm simply saying if this forum becomes monotone it will have a mass exedous.
I also lurk and occasionally post but find so much of this stuff mind numbing.
If posters were inhibited from expressing their passion this would turn into a real bore. Not sayings other people don't have rights or shouldn't be upset. I'm simply saying if this forum becomes monotone it will have a mass exedous.
#30
Yeahright. 
Unless you don't like the ideas, in which case those people should be banned. Since you have determined someone contributes nothing meaningful, you call for him to be banned.
Would it work the other way if he claims you contribute nothing meaningful?
That there is pretty funny, Mr. Dashdog. 
As in ironic.
.

Would it work the other way if he claims you contribute nothing meaningful?

As in ironic.
.


