A New Idea for SLI Merger Arbitration Hearing
08-04-2014 | 04:44 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
The APA made a mistake counter suing to have unilateral control of the SLI at SCS (unless delay is their strategy). To "preserve service" I would suppose the NMB might be reluctant to declare SCS until the APA demonstrates an intention to follow the law they necessitated. The mediation is a way to move the red tape along, albeit at the speed of bureaucracy.
08-04-2014 | 07:15 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
A New Idea for SLI Merger Arbitration Hearing
I say out with the APA and USAPA. We need a card drive after SCS. I'd love to see a real union on property...maybe the Teamsters. There's enough disenfranchised pilots in both memberships. It just might work.
08-04-2014 | 07:27 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Please, please, please hook me up with those mushrooms, you are tripping balls.
08-04-2014 | 08:40 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
A New Idea for SLI Merger Arbitration Hearing
That was made very clear to me by a couple of ex-TWA guys that graciously allowed me on their jumpseat a while back. Alas, USAPA is the one union on God's green earth with more disfunction than APA. But, I still think an outside union would stand a decent chance of winning a representation vote. (I admit it will likely never happen, though.)
08-04-2014 | 01:58 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
I'm sure the impact on PHX pilots is just collateral and coincidental.
08-04-2014 | 07:37 PM
#29
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
08-04-2014 | 08:28 PM
#30
Flies With The Hat On
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
A New Idea for SLI Merger Arbitration Hearing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolphinflyer
PT,
Glad you're an expert on APA mistakes. It seems to be a common theme from your side. Your side dumped your dysfunctional shotgun marriage in APA's lap and have started blaming it for the associated problems.
Staunch Usapians consider EVERYONE else's actions to be mistakes if they defy the Usapian agenda. Why should other unions be different from arbitrators, managements, judges and the general sentiment of the rest of the industry ?
Originally Posted by Dolphinflyer
PT,
Glad you're an expert on APA mistakes. It seems to be a common theme from your side. Your side dumped your dysfunctional shotgun marriage in APA's lap and have started blaming it for the associated problems.
Staunch Usapians consider EVERYONE else's actions to be mistakes if they defy the Usapian agenda. Why should other unions be different from arbitrators, managements, judges and the general sentiment of the rest of the industry ?
Please don't label whole groups of people.
Stop the hate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
