![]() |
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 1718757)
Don't care which side wins or if it ends up meeting in the middle. Get it over with!
I really wish the union leadership at this airline would realize that the world doesn't begin or end in CLT. Not everyone wants to be locked into where they currently are. |
In The PA, the APA wants the west to have a seat, American Airlines wants the west to have a seat and both will argue that position in front of the arbitrator. Usapa will be the only one arguing the west shouldn't get a seat.
|
well that and a few court rulings that say the west shouldn't. Not to mention past precedence. But that's Ok....lets give them a seat.....You know because we all know arbitrators are infallible.
Interesting that the APA doesn't want to give the TWA guys their own merger comm....... |
Originally Posted by MatchPoint
(Post 1718771)
....... The ability for all 3 to argue their sides and none to have control over the award is best. Just let the arbitrators do their job, accept it and move the hell on!
|
After four pages of heated debate, I can tell this is an important issue. But as a military pilot looking to move on to the next level soon, I honestly have no idea what the NIC is. SLI I understand, but NIC, no idea. Anyone care to pass me the Cliffs Notes?
|
Originally Posted by Wollac
(Post 1718801)
After four pages of heated debate, I can tell this is an important issue. But as a military pilot looking to move on to the next level soon, I honestly have no idea what the NIC is. SLI I understand, but NIC, no idea. Anyone care to pass me the Cliffs Notes?
|
Originally Posted by crzipilot
(Post 1718794)
well that and a few court rulings that say the west shouldn't. Not to mention past precedence. But that's Ok....lets give them a seat.....You know because we all know arbitrators are infallible.
Interesting that the APA doesn't want to give the TWA guys their own merger comm....... |
Nic ...
If west pilots want to present their case they can... This sounds feasible.
FYI, The CLT chairman has made what I feel to be many grossly inaccurate statements and forecasts regarding SLI in the past. Once AOL responds to this we may see a resumption of fireworks on this thread. Alternatively, AOL could settle now, and avoid any uncertainty. This may be preferable for a more known/partnered outcome? |
Originally Posted by crzipilot
(Post 1718794)
well that and a few court rulings that say the west shouldn't. Not to mention past precedence. But that's Ok....lets give them a seat.....You know because we all know arbitrators are infallible.
Interesting that the APA doesn't want to give the TWA guys their own merger comm....... Maybe we can form committees for AirCal,Reno, TransCaribbean, and those that flew former EAL routes which of course would have to cover the former Branniff routes. |
Originally Posted by Wollac
(Post 1718801)
After four pages of heated debate, I can tell this is an important issue. But as a military pilot looking to move on to the next level soon, I honestly have no idea what the NIC is. SLI I understand, but NIC, no idea. Anyone care to pass me the Cliffs Notes?
It's a fight about seniority that won't impact you but you might have to listen to various versions of 'what should have been done' for decades. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:56 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands