Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   American (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/)
-   -   Vote Results 1/30. Let's see who can guess it (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/86196-vote-results-1-30-lets-see-who-can-guess.html)

Alcoholic 01-30-2015 04:11 AM


Originally Posted by ERflyer (Post 1814766)
At Delta our last contract passed 62-38.

But that was for a 3 1/2 year contract which expires this year.
Six years seems too long. You'd be better voting no on this and at least getting the average of us and UAL on Jan. 1. We'll probably get a nice raise on our next contract if your vote fails. Otherwise we will have a ceiling limited by your pay.

If it fails: We will most likely convert a portion of our profit sharing to pay - a more guaranteed income. This would make our rates higher along with a regular raise not tied to profit sharing thus increasing your pay. I think we'd get at least 25% over 4 years.

If your contract passes - let's be honest. Delta will say our total pay, which includes profit sharing is already greater than your pay. They won't give us much of a raise.

Industry pay will stagnate for the next 5 years with 3% raises as our company's make $10B a year.

I don't understand? You want the pilots to vote no and lock in a lower rate Jan. 1st because it will make Delta pay its pilots more? Don't understand that logic.

I don't think the industry is too worried about helping Delta out. They were not worried about the industry when they made the RJ machine.

Now... Contract being too long is a very valise point.

bigscrillywilli 01-30-2015 04:15 AM


Originally Posted by texaspilot76 (Post 1814939)
I'm not afraid to admit I voted yes. There is no other choice given the circumstances.

Despite all this Internet babbling and certain domicile rep's rhetoric, I predict passage of this agreement. What are all you chat board blowhards gonna do when it passes? Go talking smack to the majority of your fellow pilots for voting yes? If this passes, all of you diehard "no" advocates will be the minority.

What the hell are you going to do if it fails? Jump off a building?

gettinbumped 01-30-2015 04:16 AM


Originally Posted by ERflyer (Post 1814766)
At Delta our last contract passed 62-38.

But that was for a 3 1/2 year contract which expires this year.
Six years seems too long. You'd be better voting no on this and at least getting the average of us and UAL on Jan. 1. We'll probably get a nice raise on our next contract if your vote fails. Otherwise we will have a ceiling limited by your pay.

If it fails: We will most likely convert a portion of our profit sharing to pay - a more guaranteed income. This would make our rates higher along with a regular raise not tied to profit sharing thus increasing your pay. I think we'd get at least 25% over 4 years.

If your contract passes - let's be honest. Delta will say our total pay, which includes profit sharing is already greater than your pay. They won't give us much of a raise.

Industry pay will stagnate for the next 5 years with 3% raises as our company's make $10B a year.

I think we all get how pattern bargaining works, but wow my friend.... The world doesn't revolve around what you want to happens to you at DAL.

ERflyer 01-30-2015 05:10 AM


Originally Posted by Alcoholic (Post 1814997)
I don't understand? You want the pilots to vote no and lock in a lower rate Jan. 1st because it will make Delta pay its pilots more? Don't understand that logic.

I don't think the industry is too worried about helping Delta out. They were not worried about the industry when they made the RJ machine.

Now... Contract being too long is a very valise point.

Too late now but I believe it's called delayed gratification as you'd make more a year from now.

Also, the B-scale was started by AMR. We are tied together in this industry whether we like it or not. The mistakes by one are felt by all.

DeadHead 01-30-2015 05:50 AM


Originally Posted by ERflyer (Post 1814766)
At Delta our last contract passed 62-38.

But that was for a 3 1/2 year contract which expires this year.
Six years seems too long. You'd be better voting no on this and at least getting the average of us and UAL on Jan. 1. We'll probably get a nice raise on our next contract if your vote fails. Otherwise we will have a ceiling limited by your pay.

If it fails: We will most likely convert a portion of our profit sharing to pay - a more guaranteed income. This would make our rates higher along with a regular raise not tied to profit sharing thus increasing your pay. I think we'd get at least 25% over 4 years.

If your contract passes - let's be honest. Delta will say our total pay, which includes profit sharing is already greater than your pay. They won't give us much of a raise.

Industry pay will stagnate for the next 5 years with 3% raises as our company's make $10B a year.

I truly, with all sincerity, hope that more than 50% of the DAL pilot group doesn't share this opinion.

eaglefly 01-30-2015 05:55 AM


Originally Posted by texaspilot76 (Post 1814939)
I'm not afraid to admit I voted yes. There is no other choice given the circumstances.

Despite all this Internet babbling and certain domicile rep's rhetoric, I predict passage of this agreement. What are all you chat board blowhards gonna do when it passes? Go talking smack to the majority of your fellow pilots for voting yes? If this passes, all of you diehard "no" advocates will be the minority.

In 2020, I won't be afraid to admit I'll vote yes. We will really have no choice under the circumstances. There will be no need to talk "smack" to anyone. You see, YOU are already proving my point about our hopelessness and helplessness in 2020 in part due to a fragmented pilot group who THEN will be split into yes and no just like now.

The only difference then will be I will be in the majority while you cry and sob about what the majority will be giving away then for quick "last contract" $$$. See you in 2020, kid.

....and don't forget, "karma is a *****" and "what comes around goes around". ;)

R57 relay 01-30-2015 05:56 AM


Originally Posted by Alcoholic (Post 1814997)
I don't understand? You want the pilots to vote no and lock in a lower rate Jan. 1st because it will make Delta pay its pilots more? Don't understand that logic.

I don't think the industry is too worried about helping Delta out. They were not worried about the industry when they made the RJ machine.

Now... Contract being too long is a very valise point.

I've had trouble with this logic too.

"We'll probably get a nice raise on our next contract if your vote fails."

If we turn this down we are locking in rates that cannot be higher than DL's. Period. So no matter what DL does, it's two largest competitors will be paying rates less than it is.

hockeypilot44 01-30-2015 06:02 AM

As a Delta pilot, I'm honestly not sure if it is better for us for this thing to pass or fail. It looks to me like you guys will be better off long term if it fails and better off for the first year if it passes. That's my opininion.

InformationEcho 01-30-2015 06:11 AM


Originally Posted by ERflyer (Post 1815022)
TWe are tied together in this industry whether we like it or not. The mistakes by one are felt by all.

Well, AAG pilots of every flavor can apologize to the industry for eating a concession sandwich with a smile as profits roll in.

It's not going for great, it's doing it for less.

JKflight 01-30-2015 06:17 AM

If this thing passes 51/49 Parker, Kirby, and Glass will be throwing a party in Dallas tonight like few have ever seen.....

Let's just hope Doug doesn't try to drive himself home afterwards!

PurpleTurtle 01-30-2015 06:19 AM


Originally Posted by ERflyer (Post 1815022)
Too late now but I believe it's called delayed gratification as you'd make more a year from now.

Also, the B-scale was started by AMR. We are tied together in this industry whether we like it or not. The mistakes by one are felt by all.

Are we tied together?

One word... Comair.

PurpleTurtle 01-30-2015 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by bigscrillywilli (Post 1814734)
I'm going to demand a recount either way!!

Thank you for the reminder. There is no way to ever prove it wasn't rigged by some savvy programmers (on DUI's pay roll, or APA's). We have all been passionate about something we have absolutely no control over, in more ways than we care to admit.

inline five 01-30-2015 06:47 AM

UAL and DAL have historically been paid well above AA and have had much better contracts to boot. AA will even have rates above them for the time being yet people still are causing a fit. It's no secret that of the top carriers AA was in the bottom until the Airways bankruptcy deals. DAL and UAL have paid better overall long term and yet they continue to get raises. I wouldn't worry about what they think, they have a very limited understanding about how the rate reset even works.

Saabs 01-30-2015 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by inline five (Post 1815108)
UAL and DAL have historically been paid well above AA and have had much better contracts to boot. AA will even have rates above them for the time being yet people still are causing a fit. It's no secret that of the top carriers AA was in the bottom until the Airways bankruptcy deals. DAL and UAL have paid better overall long term and yet they continue to get raises. I wouldn't worry about what they think, they have a very limited understanding about how the rate reset even works.

Interesting thay you chose to type that AA will have rates above them, yet you don't mention that our W2's won't be above them even for the one year our rates will be.

Why did you type it like that?

inline five 01-30-2015 07:00 AM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 1815115)
Interesting thay you chose to type that AA will have rates above them, yet you don't mention that our W2's won't be above them even for the one year our rates will be.

Why did you type it like that?

Because it's true.

But voting no would leave us with a subpar contract and rates the average of the other two. We're going to be further behind voting no than yes.

On a recent union phone call the negotiators were essentially begging guys to vote yes. All this fear that people have come up with is completely unfounded.

When does this end? I forgot. I thought it was 930 am central, correct?

Saabs 01-30-2015 07:06 AM


Originally Posted by inline five (Post 1815120)
Because it's true.

But voting no would leave us with a subpar contract and rates the average of the other two. We're going to be further behind voting no than yes.

On a recent union phone call the negotiators were essentially begging guys to vote yes. All this fear that people have come up with is completely unfounded.

When does this end? I forgot. I thought it was 930 am central, correct?

I want it to be over with too.

But my W2 is more important than my payrate. Just don't want people to fall for payrates.

ackattacker 01-30-2015 07:11 AM

Well it passed... it's official

66/34, 94% turnout.

Who was closest? I'd go back and look but I'm too busy ordering my new pool :)

Edit: Looks like Silverandsore nailed it on page 1.

Saabs 01-30-2015 07:15 AM


Originally Posted by ackattacker (Post 1815131)
Well it passed... it's official

66/34, 94% turnout.

Who was closest? I'd go back and look but I'm too busy ordering my new pool :)

Edit: Looks like Silverandsore nailed it on page 1.

Haha how much do pools cost?

Congrats to the yes voters. While I think this is bad long term the majority voted for it. So be it.

Most importantly texaspilot can finally pay his bills!

PurpleTurtle 01-30-2015 08:01 AM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 1815137)
Haha how much do pools cost?

Congrats to the yes voters. While I think this is bad long term the majority voted for it. So be it.

Most importantly texaspilot can finally pay his bills!


Too bad the LA Reps didn't have the integrity to live by that adage when the BOD passed the counter offer.

Too bad Wilson didn't live by it, but chose instead to invent his own negotiating ultimatum (nothing but retropay letter to Kirby).

Now that the subversives have clawed on top, everyone has to have integrity.. now. (NewsFlash to subversives... The no voters have had integrity all along. :cool: )

On the bright side, there are fewer Sky Flowers among us than I thought.

psw757 01-30-2015 08:09 AM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 1815126)
I want it to be over with too.

But my W2 is more important than my payrate. Just don't want people to fall for payrates.

More pay per hour usually means it takes less hours to get what you want to financially out of the company.

I have zero interest in this 85 hour garbage.

psw757 01-30-2015 08:10 AM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 1815137)
Haha how much do pools cost?

Congrats to the yes voters. While I think this is bad long term the majority voted for it. So be it.

Most importantly texaspilot can finally pay his bills!

That is funny!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands