![]() |
Third listers
So how many third listers don't know they are third listers? XXXXXX *2011 hire and member of epsic just testified on the record he was unaware he was a third lister.
|
What's your point?
|
I don't know if I'm a third, fourth or fifth lister.
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1982731)
So how many third listers don't know they are third listers? XXXX 2011 hire and member of epsic just testified on the record he was unaware he was a third lister.
Wow. :confused: |
I'm sure he knows exactly where he stands-nullity.
Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday? |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1982756)
...
Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday? |
Read his comments on "stapling" and the importance of longevity, then go read the AWA pilot's proposal in the US/AW merger. Same guy.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1982752)
An East pilot hired in 2011 is unaware he was not subject to the Nicolau award, i.e., a "third list" US Airways pilot and considering that, he is a member of the East's pilot integration committee ?
Wow. :confused: |
Originally Posted by Snoopy 01
(Post 1982735)
What's your point?
|
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1982756)
I'm sure he knows exactly where he stands-nullity.
Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday? |
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1982797)
He just got destroyed by both Kennedy and freund. Who in their right mind would blatantly lie like that to a room full of experts?
|
Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
(Post 1982837)
Well, we know you weren't there on a layover, since PHL 767I Crews are flying PHX-DCA in the 757. Is there a live feed on Cactuspilot?
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1982804)
Each merger tuns on its own facts. You need to accept you were out of business in 2005.
We weren't out of business in 2005, never went out of business. Besides, why would a company that was "out of business" be granted over 500 of the top slots? Tell everyone what you guys proposed. |
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1982842)
Getting photos as welll
|
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1982898)
Defense of the unethical.
We weren't out of business in 2005, never went out of business. Besides, why would a company that was "out of business" be granted over 500 of the top slots? Tell everyone what you guys proposed. |
Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
(Post 1982837)
Well, we know you weren't there on a layover, since PHL 767I Crews are flying PHX-DCA in the 757. Is there a live feed on Cactuspilot?
Hence the fallacy that the only Phoenix crews flying into DCA come non-stop from Phoenix. We fly from many cities into DCA and layover. Just this summer I have done MSY, MCO, TPA, BOS, LGA, CLT and PHL. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1982900)
Your going to have to pay for what you have done as a group, make peace with it.
|
Originally Posted by cactus320
(Post 1982903)
Hence the fallacy that the only Phoenix crews flying into DCA come non-stop from Phoenix.
We fly from many cities into DCA and layover. Just this summer I have done MSY, MCO, TPA, BOS, LGA, CLT and PHL. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1982756)
I'm sure he knows exactly where he stands-nullity.
Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday? |
Welcome to the forum Joe.
|
"Third list" is a term from the 2005TA. It is conspicuously absent from the protocol agreement.
Unless you implicitly assume it is in there.. |
Is there another board that the real AA/US/AWA SLI gets hashed out on, as this board only has about 5 guys who regularly post the same things. You'd think that a few more pilots would be involved unless the majority is just unaware or just numb to the process?
As much as you guys have to complain about, there seemed to be 10x as much acrimony over the DAL/NWA SLI and that was relatively straightforward compared to this one. Maybe this one is so complex that it's really hard for most to follow along. |
Full of Luv,
If you want to read the full transcripts they are available at the link below. Day 2 should be posted soon. UPDATES |
Originally Posted by Laker24
(Post 1983101)
Full of Luv,
If you want to read the full transcripts they are available at the link below. Day 2 should be posted soon. UPDATES |
Originally Posted by full of luv
(Post 1983087)
Is there another board that the real AA/US/AWA SLI gets hashed out on, as this board only has about 5 guys who regularly post the same things. You'd think that a few more pilots would be involved unless the majority is just unaware or just numb to the process?
The arbs are gonna do what the arbs are gonna do. All we need do is sit back and wait for day 2 of the transcripts and read and read and read. Then wait on the 2 or 3 more court hearings and then the rendering. This ain't negotiations (tell AASPIC that), nothing to vote on, just attorneys presenting their case. I have said all along that our award will roughly model the UA/CO award. Are you just trying to stir the pot?? :mad: |
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
(Post 1983072)
"Third list" is a term from the 2005TA. It is conspicuously absent from the protocol agreement.
Unless you implicitly assume it is in there.. |
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
(Post 1983072)
"Third list" is a term from the 2005TA. It is conspicuously absent from the protocol agreement.
Unless you implicitly assume it is in there.. |
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1983249)
Ahhh, just realized you are talking about ta9 grievance. Better go read it, doesn't say what your attorney inferred it says and we will destroy that argument.
|
Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag
(Post 1983275)
With all due respect cactus boss you need to go back and read ta9 Richard block says there is no third list and if there is one post it
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1983285)
Ta 9 definitely recognizes third list. Ta 9 just says the company doesn't have to furlough third listers first until jcba.
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1982797)
He just got destroyed by both Kennedy and freund. Who in their right mind would blatantly lie like that to a room full of experts?
|
Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag
(Post 1983308)
Actually I am very familiar with TA9 and it's Bloch's interpretation of the TA. He clearly states that there is no Third List. Again, if there is a Third List, please post it here. I would love to see it.
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1983321)
I don't have the language available to me right now. Just going off what my merger committee is telling me. Of course you guys don't recognize that we ever merged so doesn't surprise me you don't recognize that the ta required all pilots hired after our merger be junior. Go read freunds cross of your "third lister" (pages 419-431) to grab a clue where that argument will end up.
|
In what universe are pilots hired after a merger announcement placed on a seniority list higher than pilots employed prior to the merger? To even suggest it nullifies any other related factual data presented.
|
Originally Posted by flyinawa
(Post 1983390)
In what universe are pilots hired after a merger announcement placed on a seniority list higher than pilots employed prior to the merger? To even suggest it nullifies any other related factual data presented.
|
Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag
(Post 1983359)
I understand that pilots hired after the "merger date" are to be junior (no one is arguing that).
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1983400)
The Epsic is arguing exactly that, they place original pre merger America west pilots junior to 2012 hires. Absolute lunacy.
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1983249)
Ahhh, just realized you are talking about ta9 grievance. Better go read it, doesn't say what your attorney inferred it says and we will destroy that argument.
Seriously, you claim a term "third lister", if such a contractual term exists beyond the confines of your thick skull then you could easily provide us all a link and quote. I am not familiar with the term in any contract other than the 2005 TA... How about it... Ya got a link to a contract or not? |
Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag
(Post 1983438)
I'm talking about the transition agreement that no longer exist here at Airways, that's where the original third Lister came from. I guess it's ok with you that mean ole usapa moved the west furlouged pilots that were hired on the east seniority list in 2011as new hires up the East seniority list in front of the so called third listers with their West date of hire on the east list. With 6 of them hiding with seniority numbers on both lists, some on all three lists hoping to get a better relative position ahead of their own West pilots in the seniority integration. You mean that universe??? The west pilots on the east list with captains positions on the 190 or fo positions on the 330 making thousands more than their senior West pilots you mean that universe?
|
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
(Post 1983453)
Do you know how to quote things or provide links?
Seriously, you claim a term "third lister", if such a contractual term exists beyond the confines of your thick skull then you could easily provide us all a link and quote. I am not familiar with the term in any contract other than the 2005 TA... How about it... Ya got a link to a contract or not? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands