Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   American (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/)
-   -   Third listers (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/90950-third-listers.html)

cactiboss 09-30-2015 11:09 AM

Third listers
 
So how many third listers don't know they are third listers? XXXXXX *2011 hire and member of epsic just testified on the record he was unaware he was a third lister.

Snoopy 01 09-30-2015 11:13 AM

What's your point?

viper548 09-30-2015 11:17 AM

I don't know if I'm a third, fourth or fifth lister.

eaglefly 09-30-2015 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1982731)
So how many third listers don't know they are third listers? XXXX 2011 hire and member of epsic just testified on the record he was unaware he was a third lister.

An East pilot hired in 2011 is unaware he was not subject to the Nicolau award, i.e., a "third list" US Airways pilot and considering that, he is a member of the East's pilot integration committee ?

Wow. :confused:

R57 relay 09-30-2015 11:42 AM

I'm sure he knows exactly where he stands-nullity.

Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday?

Arado 234 09-30-2015 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1982756)
...

Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday?

would you mind to tell us more?

R57 relay 09-30-2015 12:03 PM

Read his comments on "stapling" and the importance of longevity, then go read the AWA pilot's proposal in the US/AW merger. Same guy.

cactiboss 09-30-2015 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by eaglefly (Post 1982752)
An East pilot hired in 2011 is unaware he was not subject to the Nicolau award, i.e., a "third list" US Airways pilot and considering that, he is a member of the East's pilot integration committee ?

Wow. :confused:

He just got destroyed by both Kennedy and freund. Who in their right mind would blatantly lie like that to a room full of experts?

cactiboss 09-30-2015 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by Snoopy 01 (Post 1982735)
What's your point?

No credibility

cactiboss 09-30-2015 12:31 PM


Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1982756)
I'm sure he knows exactly where he stands-nullity.

Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday?

Each merger tuns on its own facts. You need to accept you were out of business in 2005.

EMBFlyer 09-30-2015 01:15 PM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1982797)
He just got destroyed by both Kennedy and freund. Who in their right mind would blatantly lie like that to a room full of experts?

Well, we know you weren't there on a layover, since PHL 767I Crews are flying PHX-DCA in the 757. Is there a live feed on Cactuspilot?

cactiboss 09-30-2015 01:24 PM


Originally Posted by EMBFlyer (Post 1982837)
Well, we know you weren't there on a layover, since PHL 767I Crews are flying PHX-DCA in the 757. Is there a live feed on Cactuspilot?

Getting photos as welll

R57 relay 09-30-2015 03:31 PM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1982804)
Each merger tuns on its own facts. You need to accept you were out of business in 2005.

Defense of the unethical.

We weren't out of business in 2005, never went out of business. Besides, why would a company that was "out of business" be granted over 500 of the top slots?

Tell everyone what you guys proposed.

R57 relay 09-30-2015 03:32 PM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1982842)
Getting photos as welll

Creepy. Really creepy.

cactiboss 09-30-2015 03:33 PM


Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1982898)
Defense of the unethical.

We weren't out of business in 2005, never went out of business. Besides, why would a company that was "out of business" be granted over 500 of the top slots?

Tell everyone what you guys proposed.

Your going to have to pay for what you have done as a group, make peace with it.

cactus320 09-30-2015 03:34 PM


Originally Posted by EMBFlyer (Post 1982837)
Well, we know you weren't there on a layover, since PHL 767I Crews are flying PHX-DCA in the 757. Is there a live feed on Cactuspilot?


Hence the fallacy that the only Phoenix crews flying into DCA come non-stop from Phoenix.

We fly from many cities into DCA and layover. Just this summer I have done MSY, MCO, TPA, BOS, LGA, CLT and PHL.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

R57 relay 09-30-2015 03:52 PM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1982900)
Your going to have to pay for what you have done as a group, make peace with it.

I don't blame your for not posting it, it's kinda embarrassing, huh?

R57 relay 09-30-2015 03:53 PM


Originally Posted by cactus320 (Post 1982903)
Hence the fallacy that the only Phoenix crews flying into DCA come non-stop from Phoenix.

We fly from many cities into DCA and layover. Just this summer I have done MSY, MCO, TPA, BOS, LGA, CLT and PHL.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In a 757? Cacti is a 757, oops, a 767 pilot.

Joe Patroni 09-30-2015 05:00 PM


Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1982756)
I'm sure he knows exactly where he stands-nullity.

Cacti, were you there for the Freund hypocrite show yesterday?

Kind of like when USAPA was elected on a platform of DOH and even put it in their constitution but showed up with a non DOH proposal before leaving? That type of "hypocrite show"?

DCA A321 FO 09-30-2015 05:06 PM

Welcome to the forum Joe.

PurpleTurtle 09-30-2015 08:03 PM

"Third list" is a term from the 2005TA. It is conspicuously absent from the protocol agreement.

Unless you implicitly assume it is in there..

full of luv 09-30-2015 08:29 PM

Is there another board that the real AA/US/AWA SLI gets hashed out on, as this board only has about 5 guys who regularly post the same things. You'd think that a few more pilots would be involved unless the majority is just unaware or just numb to the process?

As much as you guys have to complain about, there seemed to be 10x as much acrimony over the DAL/NWA SLI and that was relatively straightforward compared to this one. Maybe this one is so complex that it's really hard for most to follow along.

Laker24 09-30-2015 08:40 PM

Full of Luv,

If you want to read the full transcripts they are available at the link below. Day 2 should be posted soon.

UPDATES

full of luv 09-30-2015 09:26 PM


Originally Posted by Laker24 (Post 1983101)
Full of Luv,

If you want to read the full transcripts they are available at the link below. Day 2 should be posted soon.

UPDATES

Thanks for the link.:D

Thedude 09-30-2015 09:27 PM


Originally Posted by full of luv (Post 1983087)
Is there another board that the real AA/US/AWA SLI gets hashed out on, as this board only has about 5 guys who regularly post the same things. You'd think that a few more pilots would be involved unless the majority is just unaware or just numb to the process?

What is there to really hash?
The arbs are gonna do what the arbs are gonna do. All we need do is sit back and wait for day 2 of the transcripts and read and read and read.
Then wait on the 2 or 3 more court hearings and then the rendering.

This ain't negotiations (tell AASPIC that), nothing to vote on, just attorneys presenting their case.

I have said all along that our award will roughly model the UA/CO award.

Are you just trying to stir the pot?? :mad:

cactiboss 09-30-2015 09:32 PM


Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle (Post 1983072)
"Third list" is a term from the 2005TA. It is conspicuously absent from the protocol agreement.

Unless you implicitly assume it is in there..

I implicitly assume that we were a merged single carrier when the third listers were hired, but hey, hang on to your fantasies

cactiboss 10-01-2015 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle (Post 1983072)
"Third list" is a term from the 2005TA. It is conspicuously absent from the protocol agreement.

Unless you implicitly assume it is in there..

Ahhh, just realized you are talking about ta9 grievance. Better go read it, doesn't say what your attorney inferred it says and we will destroy that argument.

Flyin the Flag 10-01-2015 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1983249)
Ahhh, just realized you are talking about ta9 grievance. Better go read it, doesn't say what your attorney inferred it says and we will destroy that argument.

With all due respect cactus boss you need to go back and read ta9 Richard block says there is no third list and if there is one post it

cactiboss 10-01-2015 07:37 AM


Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag (Post 1983275)
With all due respect cactus boss you need to go back and read ta9 Richard block says there is no third list and if there is one post it

Ta 9 definitely recognizes third list. Ta 9 just says the company doesn't have to furlough third listers first until jcba.

Flyin the Flag 10-01-2015 08:07 AM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1983285)
Ta 9 definitely recognizes third list. Ta 9 just says the company doesn't have to furlough third listers first until jcba.

Actually I am very familiar with TA9 and it's Bloch's interpretation of the TA. He clearly states that there is no Third List. Again, if there is a Third List, please post it here. I would love to see it.

EskimoJoe 10-01-2015 08:31 AM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1982797)
He just got destroyed by both Kennedy and freund. Who in their right mind would blatantly lie like that to a room full of experts?

Rhetorical Question. An Easthole. It's what they excel at.

cactiboss 10-01-2015 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag (Post 1983308)
Actually I am very familiar with TA9 and it's Bloch's interpretation of the TA. He clearly states that there is no Third List. Again, if there is a Third List, please post it here. I would love to see it.

I don't have the language available to me right now. Just going off what my merger committee is telling me. Of course you guys don't recognize that we ever merged so doesn't surprise me you don't recognize that the ta required all pilots hired after our merger be junior. Go read freunds cross of your "third lister" (pages 419-431) to grab a clue where that argument will end up.

Flyin the Flag 10-01-2015 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1983321)
I don't have the language available to me right now. Just going off what my merger committee is telling me. Of course you guys don't recognize that we ever merged so doesn't surprise me you don't recognize that the ta required all pilots hired after our merger be junior. Go read freunds cross of your "third lister" (pages 419-431) to grab a clue where that argument will end up.

Well, that's the first problem. You're going by hear say. When you get the language, read it. It's written in elementary school languageo and is very clear. As far as merging, our two companies merged "systems," not "pilot seniority lists." So yes, I acknowledge that we've merged. Just waiting on a merger of seniority lists...period of when "separate operations" (as also stated in TA9) become one. So this backs up the argument of two seniority lists, not three. No "Third list." I understand that pilots hired after the "merger date" are to be junior (no one is arguing that). What they are trying to get across here is that junior pilots still make up an East or West Seniority List. (Mostly East List bc West has not hired new pilots until recently). That's called "company of origin). These new pilots bring jobs unlike our friends over at Eagle or pilots who were on furlough for many years. These junior pilots are getting placed junior to pilots who have not even worked at mainline (East, West or AA). So understandably they want to be recognized as an East or West Pilot. Not some stupid "third list" that doesn't even exist.

flyinawa 10-01-2015 10:53 AM

In what universe are pilots hired after a merger announcement placed on a seniority list higher than pilots employed prior to the merger? To even suggest it nullifies any other related factual data presented.

cactiboss 10-01-2015 11:10 AM


Originally Posted by flyinawa (Post 1983390)
In what universe are pilots hired after a merger announcement placed on a seniority list higher than pilots employed prior to the merger? To even suggest it nullifies any other related factual data presented.

That universe is called USAPIA.

cactiboss 10-01-2015 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag (Post 1983359)
I understand that pilots hired after the "merger date" are to be junior (no one is arguing that).

The Epsic is arguing exactly that, they place original pre merger America west pilots junior to 2012 hires. Absolute lunacy.

Flyin the Flag 10-01-2015 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1983400)
The Epsic is arguing exactly that, they place original pre merger America west pilots junior to 2012 hires. Absolute lunacy.

I'm talking about the transition agreement that no longer exist here at Airways, that's where the original third Lister came from. I guess it's ok with you that mean ole usapa moved the west furlouged pilots that were hired on the east seniority list in 2011as new hires up the East seniority list in front of the so called third listers with their West date of hire on the east list. With 6 of them hiding with seniority numbers on both lists, some on all three lists hoping to get a better relative position ahead of their own West pilots in the seniority integration. You mean that universe??? The west pilots on the east list with captains positions on the 190 or fo positions on the 330 making thousands more than their senior West pilots you mean that universe?

PurpleTurtle 10-01-2015 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1983249)
Ahhh, just realized you are talking about ta9 grievance. Better go read it, doesn't say what your attorney inferred it says and we will destroy that argument.

Do you know how to quote things or provide links?

Seriously, you claim a term "third lister", if such a contractual term exists beyond the confines of your thick skull then you could easily provide us all a link and quote.

I am not familiar with the term in any contract other than the 2005 TA... How about it... Ya got a link to a contract or not?

cactiboss 10-01-2015 02:09 PM


Originally Posted by Flyin the Flag (Post 1983438)
I'm talking about the transition agreement that no longer exist here at Airways, that's where the original third Lister came from. I guess it's ok with you that mean ole usapa moved the west furlouged pilots that were hired on the east seniority list in 2011as new hires up the East seniority list in front of the so called third listers with their West date of hire on the east list. With 6 of them hiding with seniority numbers on both lists, some on all three lists hoping to get a better relative position ahead of their own West pilots in the seniority integration. You mean that universe??? The west pilots on the east list with captains positions on the 190 or fo positions on the 330 making thousands more than their senior West pilots you mean that universe?

Wow, how benevolent of your scab union, unreal.

cactiboss 10-01-2015 02:10 PM


Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle (Post 1983453)
Do you know how to quote things or provide links?

Seriously, you claim a term "third lister", if such a contractual term exists beyond the confines of your thick skull then you could easily provide us all a link and quote.

I am not familiar with the term in any contract other than the 2005 TA... How about it... Ya got a link to a contract or not?

Your tool of a third listed got to read it into the record while his seniority thieving daddy watched


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands