Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
A/C Training Under An LLC >

A/C Training Under An LLC

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

A/C Training Under An LLC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:49 PM
  #1  
A Second Past V1
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw2097's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Assumed
Posts: 743
Default A/C Training Under An LLC

lets say that an llc has an asset that is an aircraft.

lets also say that people can buy into the llc based on some monthy/annual maintenance fee and nothing more.

now lets also say that not all those people have their certs (ie, no flight experience.)

considering that fuel is the only outside variable and the cfi would not be getting any kind of reimbursement...

if someone else is in the llc and has their cfi tickets, can they give flight training to those other people who are involved in an llc?

the only logic i could come up with is yes, seeing that both instructor and 'student' are members of the llc, and therefore are owners of the aircraft registered under the llc. this logic also negates the need for 100 hour inspection as per 91.409(b) since the cfi is not getting paid and there are no paying passengers on board.

any little insight helps cause for the time being ive hit a brick wall...
Outlaw2097 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 05:11 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 135 FO
Posts: 148
Default

Why would you be doing CFI work and not be getting paid for it???
floridaCFII is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 05:17 PM
  #3  
A Second Past V1
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw2097's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Assumed
Posts: 743
Default

Originally Posted by floridaCFII View Post
Why would you be doing CFI work and not be getting paid for it???
no need for 100 hours.
Outlaw2097 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 05:25 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 135 FO
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by Outlaw2097 View Post
no need for 100 hours.
That may well be, however I suspect you're going to run into quite a few people on this board (myself included) who take issue with people working for free. We're professionals, we should be paid as such. People who work as a CFI for free are lowering the profession for the rest of us who are trying to earn a living.

Now back to the topic, I'm not sure if this would be related or not, since you are both technically "employees" of the LLC, but I can tell you that when I'm paid to act as CFI for a private owner's aircraft, a 100hr is not required because my services do not constitute "operation for hire"
floridaCFII is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 06:07 PM
  #5  
A Second Past V1
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw2097's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Assumed
Posts: 743
Default

Originally Posted by floridaCFII View Post
That may well be, however I suspect you're going to run into quite a few people on this board (myself included) who take issue with people working for free.
Originally Posted by Outlaw2097 View Post
lets say that an llc has an asset that is an aircraft.

lets also say that people can buy into the llc based on some monthy/annual maintenance fee.
interpret what im saying however you wish, but it still doesnt solve my question...
Outlaw2097 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:10 PM
  #6  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

Originally Posted by Outlaw2097 View Post
interpret what im saying however you wish, but it still doesnt solve my question...
Best bet is to call the local FSDO and explain your plan. You may find a pleasant surprise in that the feds might agree, my experience says they'll call a flight school.
HSLD is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:14 PM
  #7  
A Second Past V1
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw2097's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Assumed
Posts: 743
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD View Post
Best bet is to call the local FSDO and explain your plan. You may find a pleasant surprise in that the feds might agree, my experience says they'll call a flight school.
they were stumped today and were going to look into it.

also do you or anyone else know by chance whats the faa/fsdo definition of a "flying club" ?
Outlaw2097 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:17 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 135 FO
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by Outlaw2097 View Post
interpret what im saying however you wish, but it still doesnt solve my question...
Oh wait... are you saying that you aren't personally paying the "fee", but you're collecting the "fee" from people who you are teaching to fly for free? In that case, you aren't working for free, you're just being paid a "fee" instead of being paid for CFIing. That way, it looks to me like you're operating a flight school and will have to comply with the 100hr.
floridaCFII is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:49 PM
  #9  
A Second Past V1
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw2097's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Assumed
Posts: 743
Default

Originally Posted by floridaCFII View Post
are you saying that you aren't personally paying the "fee", but you're collecting the "fee" from people who you are teaching to fly for free?
i wouldnt be collecting money. the llc would. and the fee is buying into the llc, thus buying into the aircraft (among other assets).

therefore wouldnt it be owned by the person(s) and instruction would be in 'their' aircraft...right?
Outlaw2097 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 08:02 PM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,269
Default

DANGER! In some states you cannot use an LLC for purposes other than a legit business to generate profit!

Make sure your state allows you to use an LLC for purely asset protection purposes.

Also, I believe that activities which do not support the business model of the LLC (ie activities between LLC members) would not be considered to have anything to do with the LLC.

You could form an LLC to hold an airplane to conduct for-profit flight training, but I think any training between members who did not pay the going rate would

a) Not be considered to be under the legal veil of the LLC and

b) Might well be considered misuse of LLC assets.


A fundamental principle of LLC operation is to not mix LLC finances and assets with personal assets, doing so invalidates the legal protection of the LLC.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
forgot to bid
Major
485
04-03-2009 07:34 PM
SayAgain
Aviation Law
3
02-24-2009 02:36 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
ChillBillPilot
Major
32
10-09-2008 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices