Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Turbine Time as essentially a ridealong >

Turbine Time as essentially a ridealong

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Turbine Time as essentially a ridealong

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2009, 07:24 AM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Default Turbine Time as essentially a ridealong

A friend of a friend is in a position to take me along on some maintenance flights in a Jetstream to give me some turbine time. As the largest aircraft I've flown so far is a Seneca IV, I'm obviously not going to be logging PIC or SIC. If we assume I actually end up helping to fly this aircraft to some extent, is there any way I can log Turbine time legally?
DanR is offline  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:30 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Default

Only if he is an instructor with a jetsream type. Or an ATP with the type. You can always log the radio time though;)
Left Handed is offline  
Old 04-21-2009, 09:10 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by DanR View Post
I'm obviously not going to be logging PIC or SIC.
Why not? AFAIK you don't need an "SIC type" to log SIC if the plane requires two people up front. (I don't know if a Jetstream does or not). And someone will know better than me... but could if be logged as "PIC/Dual Received" if the ATP in command can instruct in that plane towards a type rating (don't flame me too fast, I admit I don't know off hand)?

If he's a MEI that will give you some more option.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 04-21-2009, 09:15 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,319
Default

You can log anything you want, it's your logbook.

However...employers generally want to see FAR-legal time only (and sometimes they are more stringent than that with regards to PIC).

If the guy is an MEI you can get dual-received. You could also legally do safety pilot time, but future employers would be very suspicious of SP time logged in a ME turbine aircraft...they would suspect (correctly) that the real reason for the flight was not hood time.

If the jetstream were certified for two pilots (I don't think it is), you could log SIC.

Also be aware that at interviews for entry-level jobs, they will usually talk systems about one of the airplanes you have flown...and they often pick the most complex. If you log it, you might end up trying to explain the jetstream electrical or pressurization system at a regional interview.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:17 AM
  #5  
pants on the ground
 
mmaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: back seat
Posts: 1,358
Default

I was in a similar situation with a CJ2 and a glider. I didn't log either but have made a note in the back pages just as a reminder. Like rickair said I wouldn't want to talk bout the plane other than that I had the chance to fly it for story purposes.
mmaviator is offline  
Old 04-21-2009, 12:02 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
unemployedagain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Non flying, pays better than any front seat, home every night, not missing the crashpad/
Posts: 133
Default

Isn't the Jetstream a two pilot plane? Would'nt one have to be giving dual in order to meet that requirement?
unemployedagain is offline  
Old 04-23-2009, 08:19 AM
  #7  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Default

Thanks for the replies, guys. He's not an MEI that I know of, but yes it is a two pilot aircraft so my being there was basically a formality. I ended up logging it just as multi/complex time (I don't have room for a turbine column and as I'm starting a job as a CFI I'm not willing to give up the Complex column yet), and I'll leave it off the resume to keep from getting interrogated on Jetstream hydraulics my first regional interview.

Again: thanks for the advice.
DanR is offline  
Old 04-23-2009, 08:42 AM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,319
Default

Originally Posted by unemployedagain View Post
Isn't the Jetstream a two pilot plane? Would'nt one have to be giving dual in order to meet that requirement?
I believe it is certified for single pilot ops. It may be certified for either single OR dual pilot ops in which case you could log SIC (comply with part 91 training requirements).

Just because 135/121 operators may use two pilots does NOT mean the aircraft is certified for two pilots for part 91 purposes.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-23-2009, 06:04 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,732
Default

The 3100 requires one pilot per the TCDS, the 3200 and 4100 require 2.

And since there is a type rating for the 3100 (which covers the 3200) and 4100, I wouldn't put down PIC.

Last edited by Twin Wasp; 04-23-2009 at 06:13 PM. Reason: Added type rating info.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 04-24-2009, 10:10 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,319
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
The 3100 requires one pilot per the TCDS, the 3200 and 4100 require 2.

And since there is a type rating for the 3100 (which covers the 3200) and 4100, I wouldn't put down PIC.
OK, so you could only log dual received from a typed MEI in the 3100, no PIC.

In the 3200/4100 you could log dual received or SIC. No PIC.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
USMCFLYR
Hiring News
10
03-04-2009 06:13 AM
ugflyer
Regional
43
02-11-2009 02:06 PM
stoki
Regional
36
08-06-2008 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices