Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

FAA policy 8900.78

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2009, 12:01 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default FAA policy 8900.78

Below is an exceprt of proposed policy
NOTICE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION


N 8900.78






National Policy



Effective Date: 06/24/2009


Cancellation Date: 12/31/2009

SUBJ:
Focused Program Review of Air Carrier Flight Crewmember Training, Qualification and Management

1. Purpose of This Notice. This notice cancels N 8900.77, Focused Program Review of Air Carrier Flight Crewmember Training, Qualification and Management. This notice changes the focus of the requirements of the previous notice and establishes a new deadline. The requirement to conduct a focused program review of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 121 air carrier programs for training, checking and managing flight crewmembers with emphasis on low‑time flight crewmembers and those who have failed evaluation events and/or demonstrated a repetitive need for additional training.

2. Audience. The primary audience for this notice is principal operations inspectors (POI) responsible for the approval, review and surveillance of 14 CFR part 121 air carrier flight crewmember training and qualification programs. The secondary audience includes Flight Standards personnel in certificate-holding district offices (CHDO), branches and divisions in the regions and headquarters.

3. Where You Can Find This Notice. Inspectors can access this notice through the Flight Standards Information Management System (FSIMS) at http://fsims.avs.faa.gov. Operators may find this notice on the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Web site at Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS).

4. Applicability. This notice applies to all 14 CFR part 121 air carriers with the exception of part 121 air carriers whose aircraft fleets have operation specification (OpSpec) A034 designated Advanced Qualification Program (AQP) curriculums. If OpSpec A034 does not cover all of an air carrier’s fleets, then this notice applies to those fleets not covered.

5. Explanation of Cancellation and Deadline Changes. After reviewing the outcome of the Administrator’s Call to Action on June 15, 2009, Flight Standards realized the need to accelerate the accomplishment of certain provisions in N 8900.77 and to rearrange the priority of the actions required by the notice. Issues concerning pilot training have become highly publicized. FAA needs to demonstrate to Congress and to the public that we can move quickly and decisively to address critical safety issues. Flight Standards management opted to reorder the tasks required by N 8900.77. The requirements remain essentially the same. Because, per agency policy, we cannot issue a change to a notice, we opted to cancel N 8900.77 and to issue this notice with re-prioritized tasks.

6. Background. Recent accidents have made it necessary to validate part 121 air carrier flight crewmember training and qualification programs. We need also to ensure that air carriers have the capability to identify, track, and manage low-time flight crewmembers, as well as those who have failed evaluation events and/or demonstrated a repetitive need for additional training.

a. For the purpose of this notice, we define a low-time flight crewmember as meeting at least one of the following criteria:

(1) One who has either fewer than 1,500 total flight hours in turbojet powered aircraft or fewer than 1,500 hours in 14 CFR parts 121, 135, or military operations; or

(2) Fewer than 300 total flight hours in type with his or her current employer; or

(3) Fewer than 13 months in his or her current crewmember position (not type specific) with their current employer.

b. To determine whether a flight crewmember has demonstrated performance problems, consider his or her training and checking history for a period of five years before the date of the review conducted as per paragraph 7b below.

7. Action. This focused program review has two parts to be implemented by the POIs. In Part I POIs will determine the capability of their carrier to identify, track, and manage low-time flight crewmembers and those who have failed evaluations and/or or have demonstrated a repetitive need for additional training. In Part II POIs will determine that their carriers’ training and qualification programs meet regulatory standards in accordance with FAA guidance.

The rest of this can be found on the FAA website by searching for 8900.78
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 12:06 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

I think this proposal if Im reading this correctly means the FAA is less concerned about using 1500 hrs TT as a definition to be a 121 or 135 pilot, but more on ensuring that airlines that have them are capable of tracking them and keeping an eye on them in conjunction witht the POI. However if I read these definitions correctly than a pilot with over 300 hrs in his current airframe but less than 1500 TT is not considered a lo time pilot. My gut says that cant be right. Anyone else have an opinion on this? mabye read it a different way than I did?

Last edited by TPROP4ever; 07-10-2009 at 12:19 PM.
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 01:37 PM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
However if I read these definitions correctly than a pilot with over 300 hrs in his current airframe but less than 1500 TT is not considered a lo time pilot. My gut says that cant be right. Anyone else have an opinion on this? mabye read it a different way than I did?
No, it uses the word OR ...so if you meet any of the three definitions you are a low time pilot.

Also the 1500 hours is not total time, it is 1500 hours turbojet. So 4000 hour 172 captains, as well as 10,000 hour dash-8 captains are also low time for airline purposes.

Last edited by rickair7777; 07-10-2009 at 04:05 PM.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 02:12 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
No, it use the word OR ...so if you meet any of the three definitions you are a low time pilot.

Also the 1500 hours is not total time, it is 1500 hours turbojet. So 4000 hour 172 captains, as well as 10,000 hour dash-8 captains are also low time for airline purposes.
Wow, good call I didnt even register the word turbojet, my brain just registered turbine, Im so used to thinking in those terms. Wow so any of us Turboprop pilots are lo time...ouch. Makes sense though, Do you get the read I do that they are really looking more at tracking the training events that lo time pilots go through rather than how much arbitrary time they have?
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 02:15 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

actually the more I read it over, a 10,000 hr turbo prop guy is not lo time, because he has more than 1500 at a 121 or 135 carrier. Ooops never mind that dang word OR strikes again. Man they love to write these to be as confusing as possible
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 04:04 PM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

I don't think they really meant to designate all turboprop pilots as "low time" in 121 ops...

I think a non-pilot PR hack or lawyer wrote the language using "buzzwords" she had picked around FAA headquarters. But I will be surprised if they correct it...that would admit the error, and of course the government is infallible and cannot appear otherwise to the people.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 11:13 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 41
Default

It still doesn't change anything though. All it does is add extra FAA oversight/bureaucracy.
sharkbait is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 03:37 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,730
Default

It's either/or.

If you have less than 1500 hours turbo jet or less than 1500 hours 121/135/military, you meet one criteria. Fifteen hundred hours of turboprop in 121 ops gets you out of this part.

If you have less than 300 hours in type with your employer, you are low time. Everytime you transistion to a new type, you're low time.

If you change employers, you're low time.

And when you are hired or upgrade the first time, you are low time for the first 13 months. So when you're first hired, you are low time for 13 months. Then you're not. And when you upgrade you're low time again for another 13 months.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 07-11-2009, 06:08 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Default

Heck, there were folks upgrading in RJs who fit the criteria.
deadstick35 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Todzilla
Cargo
34
06-30-2009 11:29 AM
nwa757
Regional
23
06-11-2009 05:50 AM
Donkey
Hangar Talk
1
03-29-2009 11:42 AM
jungle
Money Talk
10
01-27-2009 12:55 PM
EWRflyr
Major
2
01-09-2009 03:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices