Originally Posted by JohnBurke (Post 1973559)

The FSDO level is not authorized to interpret regulation, and no answer you get at that level will be defensible, even if you receive it in writing. In other words, what you get is purely opinion, and at no time will you ever be able to fall back on that answer.

14 CFR 121.436(a)(3) states that a PIC under Part 121 must have 1000 hours as SIC either: under 121, 135, or 91K. Note that the specific 135 requirement is experience in turbojet multi engine (or multi engine in commuter operations) aircraft of 10 seats or more--in which the PIC must hold an ATP. Likewise, the 91K requirement is specifically multi-engine fixed wing airplane or powered lift operations in which the PIC must hold an ATP. In other words, not just any charter or fractional experience will do. The intent is that it's the equivalent level of responsibility and duty that a Part 121 operation would require.

If you operated for a foreign airline, it wasn't under Title 14 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, and therefore, not a 91K, 121, or 135 operation.

Time spent as pilot in command or second in command in foreign operations does not apply to the 1000 hr. SIC requirement of 14 CFR 121.436(a)(3).

Note that 121.436(a)(3) doesn't apply if you've served as PIC under Part 121 prior to July 31, 2013.

If your experience wasn't working for a US carrier under 91K, 121, or 135, you may count 500 hours of military experience as PIC in a multi engine turbine aircraft (that requires more than one pilot) toward the 1000 hours required by 121.436(a)(3).

The following FAA Chief Legal Counsel Letters of Interpretation will help clarify the answer to your question and give additional insight. These are defensible and are a reliable source regarding the Administrator's position on your question:

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf

The final letter of interpretation above serves to clarify the specific Part 135 reference requirements of the earlier Kelly letter.

Originally Posted by BlueBlood (Post 2050126)

What if I had 1000pic as a street captain before and still no 1000sic?

Originally Posted by Aurora8 (Post 2905950)

Reviving or Revising an old thread: Does anyone know if the 121 1,000 hour requirement has been changed at all in the last couple of years?

I had a discussion with a possible employer today who stated my 1,000 hrs PIC 'Commuter Airline' would not count towards the 1,000 121 requirement; but it certainly does the way I read the FAR's. To wit: 121.436 "(3) If serving as pilot in command in part 121 operations, has 1,000 hours as second in command in operations under this part, pilot in command in operations under § 91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, pilot in command in operations under § 135.243(a)(1) of this chapter, or any combination thereof." 135.243(a)(1) reads "(1) Of a turbojet airplane, of an airplane having a passenger-seat configuration, excluding each crewmember seat, of 10 seats or more, or of a multiengine airplane in a commuter operation..."
Am I missing something or as I say, have the regs changed recently?

Originally Posted by Old Prof (Post 2908801)

"Note that 121.436(a)(3) doesn't apply if you've served as PIC under Part 121 prior to July 31, 2013." I want to be fairly accurate in a novel I'm writing--would your comment mean that if the main character gets into the right seat of a regional carrier in 2011 and moves to left seat in 2012, that he wouldn't need to meet the new ATP requirements that were installed in 2013? Thanks. I won't be including much detail in the book, but want to be close to accurate in what I present.

Originally Posted by SpeedyT (Post 3063800)

I have been researching my options and a question came up. If I already have my 1000 turbine SIC 121 but decided to move closer to home for a possibly part 135/or charter gig flying the ERJ-135 and upgrade as PIC, does that PIC time counts if I were to apply at another major airline towards the future?